Interpreting article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 : implications for abortion law, policy and practice

dc.contributor.advisorNgwena, Charles
dc.contributor.coadvisorDurojaye, Ebenezer
dc.contributor.emailbchakaya@gmail.comen_ZA
dc.contributor.postgraduateAtonga, Benson Chakaya
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-17T09:25:21Z
dc.date.available2020-02-17T09:25:21Z
dc.date.created2019
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (MPhil)--University of Pretoria, 2019.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe dissertation is about interpreting article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 that provides grounds for access to abortion. The dissertation highlights existing gaps in knowledge and new developments that warrant reflection and reforms. It begins by reviewing the historical development of abortion laws and policies, and explores the discourse around women’s position in the society from the pre-colonial, through to the independent Kenya. The influence of religion and culture on abortion is also discussed. The dissertation further explores Kenya's international obligations on health with a focus on access to abortion services by women. Kenya already enacted the Treaty Making and Ratification Act, giving effects to article 2(6) of the Constitution that makes international laws particularly those relating to reproductive health part of her domestic laws. The study makes a comparative analysis of abortion jurisprudence; how abortion has been legislated and adjudicated in other jurisdictions that have almost similar architecture as Kenya. The study finds that article 26(4) of the Kenya Constitution, has an expansive interpretation that can adequately provide for women's access to abortion. Nonetheless, a holistic interpretation which incorporate other articles of the Constitution together with international human rights law remains critical. Furthermore, the study finds it imperative for Kenya to enact a legislation that will operationalise article 26(4), which will expand grounds to access abortion, and also to reinstate Standards and Guidelines including Training Curriculum for health care service providers. Finally, the study finds that the continued existence of a 1970 Penal Code is a limiting factor for women wishing to access abortion. It also constitutes a hindrance to health care professionals with competencies to provide abortion service due to its criminalising effect.en_ZA
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_ZA
dc.description.degreeMPhilen_ZA
dc.description.departmentCentre for Human Rightsen_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria.en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationAtonga, BC 2019, Interpreting article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 : implications for abortion law, policy and practice, MPhil Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73344>en_ZA
dc.identifier.otherD2019en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/73344
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectUCTDen_ZA
dc.titleInterpreting article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 : implications for abortion law, policy and practiceen_ZA
dc.typeMini Dissertationen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Atonga_Interpreting_2019.pdf
Size:
561.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: