Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening : a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorEdmond, Karen
dc.contributor.authorChadha, Shelly
dc.contributor.authorHunnicutt, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorStrobel, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorManchaiah, Vinaya
dc.contributor.authorYoshinaga-Itano, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T11:53:22Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T11:53:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : Permanent bilateral hearing loss (PBHL) is a serious condition in newborns, with a prevalence of at least one per 1000 live births. However, there has been no recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). METHODS : We registered our study protocol on PROSPERO CRD42020175451. Primary outcomes were any identification of PBHL (ie, PBHL diagnosed at any time), age of identification of PBHL, and neurodevelopment. Two reviewers searched standard databases to March 2022 and extracted data. We used fixed and random effects meta-analysis to pool data and graded the certainty of evidence using standard methods. RESULTS : The search retrieved 2834 records. We identified five studies reporting on the effects of UNHS vs no UNHS in 1 023 610 newborns. The relative risk of being identified with PBHL before nine months in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 3.28 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.84, 5.85, one study, 1 023 497 newborns, low certainty evidence). The mean difference in the age of identification of PBHL in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 13.2 months earlier (95% CI = -26.3, -0.01, two studies, 197 newborns, very low certainty evidence). The relative risk of infants eventually being identified with PBHL in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 1.01 (95% CI = 0.89, 1.14, three studies, 1 023 497 newborns, low certainty evidence). At the latest follow-up at 3-8 years, the standardised mean difference (SMD) in receptive language development between infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 0.60 z scores (95% CI = 0.07, 1.13, one study, 101 children, low certainty evidence) and the mean difference in develop developmental quotients was 7.72 (95% CI = -0.03, 15.47, three studies, 334 children, very low certainty evidence). The SMD in expressive language development was 0.39 z scores (95% CI = -0.20, 0.97, one study, 87 children, low certainty evidence) and the mean difference in developmental quotients was 10.10 scores (95% CI = 1.47, 18.73, 3 studies, 334 children, very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS : UNHS programs result in earlier identification of PBHL and may improve neurodevelopment. UNHS should be implemented across high-, middle-, and low-income countries.en_US
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen_US
dc.description.librarianam2023en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe World Health Organization, Geneva.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.jogh.orgen_US
dc.identifier.citationUniversal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) review group, Edmond, K., Chadha, S., Hunnicutt, C., Strobel, N., Manchaiah, V., Yoshinga-Itano C. Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Global Health 2022;12:12006. doi : 10.7189/jogh.12.12006.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2047-2978 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2047-2986 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.7189/jogh.12.12006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/91998
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Society of Global Healthen_US
dc.rights© World Health Organization [2021]. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License.en_US
dc.subjectNewbornen_US
dc.subjectPermanent bilateral hearing loss (PBHL)en_US
dc.subjectHearing screening programs (UNHS)en_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening : a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Edmond_Effectiveness_2022.pdf
Size:
896 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Edmond_EffectivenessSuppl_2022.pdf
Size:
1.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: