Low-grade systemic inflammation and the workplace

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Viljoen, Margaretha
Thomas (nee Negrao), Bianca Lee

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

IOS Press

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial and physical stressors can elicit the stress response, co-ordinated by interactions between neuroendocrine and inflammatory processes. The central role of the immune system, specifically low- grade systemic inflammation, is sometimes overlooked in work-related stress research. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence that work-related psychosocial and physical stressors can stimulate a low- grade systemic inflammation which, through interactions with the neurohormonal systems, may impact on the well-being and productivity of workers. METHODS: Literature searches were performed by databases and by hand. Databases used included Interface - EBSCOhost Research Databases; PsycINFO; Academic Search Complete; Africa-Wide Information; CINAHL; E-Journals; MEDLINE and PsycARTICLES. RESULTS: Psychosocial stressors, infections, poor indoor air quality, musculoskeletal injuries and chemicals can stimulate a low- grade systemic inflammation that may adversely affect workers’ mental and physical health, as well as productivity. The psychological and physical effects caused by infection-induced inflammation are generally referred to as sickness behaviour and those caused by poor indoor air quality as sick building syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Stressor-induced low- grade systemic inflammation can be a causal factor in the physical and behavioural symptoms of work-related stress. It is therefore important that those involved with the health of workers be cognisant of inappropriate or chronic low- grade inflammation as a potential health hazard.

Description

Keywords

Inflammatory, Psychosocial stress, Sickness behaviour, Sick building syndrome, Musculoskeletal injury, Multiple chemical sensitivity

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Viljoen, M. & Thomas, B.L 2021, 'Low-grade systemic inflammation and the workplace', Work, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 903-915.