Restoration potential of invaded abandoned agricultural fields : what does the seed bank tell us?

dc.contributor.authorHaussmann, Natalie S.
dc.contributor.authorDelport, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorKakembo, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorMashiane, Katlego K.
dc.contributor.authorLe Roux, Peter Christiaan
dc.contributor.emailnatalie.haussmann@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T09:23:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.description.abstractSoil seed banks can play an important role in the restoration of degraded ecosystems, especially where indigenous species are well represented in, and invasive species are largely absent from, the seed bank. Here, we studied the potential contribution of the soil seed bank to the restoration of invaded, abandoned agricultural fields in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. We recorded the aboveground cover and belowground abundance of all vascular plant species from 120 quadrats that differ in cover of the extralimital woody invader, Pteronia incana. Our results show that higher cover of P. incana is associated with lower species richness, aboveground cover, and belowground seed abundance. Furthermore, community similarity between the above‐ and belowground component was low, with the seed bank and standing vegetation having only 15 species in common and 49 species being recorded only from the seed bank. We suggest that this large number of seed bank‐only species is a relic of previous vegetation, prior to large‐scale invasion by P. incana. The most important finding from our study is the absence of P. incana from the soil seed bank. This finding, combined with the large number of mostly native species from the seed bank, holds promise from a restoration perspective. However, given the susceptibility of the invaded systems to erosion, coupled with the low grazing value of the seed bank species, we suggest that P. incana removal should be accompanied by both erosion control measures and reseeding with palatable grass species, to secure the livelihoods of local communities.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentGeography, Geoinformatics and Meteorologyen_ZA
dc.description.departmentPlant Production and Soil Scienceen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2020-01-13
dc.description.librarianhj2019en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Research Foundation of South Africa (unique grant number 94103).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1526100xen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationHaussmann, N.S., Delport, C., Kakembo, V. et al. 2019, 'Restoration potential of invaded abandoned agricultural fields: what does the seed bank tell us?', Restoration Ecology, NYP.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1061-2971 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1526-100X (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1111/rec.12923
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/68562
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherWileyen_ZA
dc.rights© 2019 Society for Ecological Restoration. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article : 'Restoration potential of invaded abandoned agricultural fields: what does the seed bank tell us?', Restoration Ecology, vol. , no. , pp. , 2019, doi : 10.1111/rec.12923. The definite version is available at : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1526100x.en_ZA
dc.subjectAbove- and belowground similarityen_ZA
dc.subjectEcological disturbanceen_ZA
dc.subjectEnvironmental degradationen_ZA
dc.subjectPteronia incanaen_ZA
dc.subjectRangeland restorationen_ZA
dc.subjectShrub invasionen_ZA
dc.titleRestoration potential of invaded abandoned agricultural fields : what does the seed bank tell us?en_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Haussmann_Restoration_2019.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: