Appropriate indications for positron emission tomography/computed tomography, 2015
dc.contributor.author | Vorster, Mariza | |
dc.contributor.author | Doruyter, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brink, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mkhize, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Holness, J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Malan, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nyakale, Nozipho E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Warwick, J.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sathekge, Mike Machaba | |
dc.contributor.email | mike.sathekge@up.ac.za | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-11T11:45:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-11T11:45:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | These recommendations are intended to serve an important and relevant role in advising referring physicians on the appropriate use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and non-18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), which can be a powerful tool in patient management in oncology, cardiology, neurology and infection/inflammation. PET is a non-invasive molecular imaging tool that provides tomographic images and quantitative parameters of perfusion, cell viability, proliferation and/or metabolic activity of tissues. These images result from the use of different substances of biological interest (sugars, amino acids, metabolic precursors, hormones) labelled with positron-emitting radionuclides (PET radiopharmaceuticals). Fusion of the aforementioned important functional information with the morphological detail provided by CT as PET/CT provides clinicians with a sensitive and accurate one-step whole-body diagnostic and prognostic tool, which directs and changes patient management. Hence PET/CT is currently the most widely used molecular imaging technology for a patient-tailored treatment approach. In these recommendations we outline which oncological and non-oncological indications are appropriate for PET/CT. Once each combination of pathology and clinical indication is defined, a recommendation is given as: 1. Recommended; 2. Recommended in select cases; 3. May be considered; or 4. Not recommended. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Nuclear Medicine | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2016 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www.samj.org.za | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Vorster, M, Doruyter, A, Brink, A, Mkhize, S, Holness, J, Malan, N, Nyakale, N, Warwick, JM & Sathekge, M 2016, 'Appropriate indications for positron emission tomography/computed tomography, 2015', South African Medical Journal, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 106-122. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0256-9574 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2078-5135 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i1.10181 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52563 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Health and Medical Publishing Group | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2016 Health & Medical Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 3.0). | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Patient management | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Imaging technology | en_ZA |
dc.subject | 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) | en_ZA |
dc.title | Appropriate indications for positron emission tomography/computed tomography, 2015 | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |