Testing the efficacy of bat monitoring methods for identification and species surveys in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa

dc.contributor.authorHoward, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorMonadjem, Ara
dc.contributor.authorMacFadyen, Duncan
dc.contributor.authorChimimba, Christian Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T08:21:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMulti-method sampling approaches are becoming increasingly popular for investigating species occurrence at specific sites, as there is a need to accurately monitor species with limited time and resources. In this study, a multi-method comparative approach was used to survey bat species in the foothills of the Drakensberg Mountain range in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. We used historical museum records and species distribution modelling (SDM) to predict which species would likely occur in our study area. We then compared physical capture (by deploying mist nets) with acoustic surveys (using an Anabat bat detector) to assess the bat species assemblages present. Species distribution models predicted eight bat species to occur from the historical checklist of 28 species recorded in the broader region, as no museum records existed for the specific study area. Species detection by acoustic data yielded the highest number of detected species (n = 11) while active trapping yielded nine species from 54 individuals of four families, namely, Laephotis botswanae, L. capensis, Myotis tricolor, Pipistrellus hesperidus, Rhinolophus clivosus, and Tadarida aegyptiaca with molecular confirmation required for Miniopterus fraterculus, R. darlingi and R. swinnyi. These complementary sampling methods may be necessary for accommodating the limitations of each individual method for a more inclusive assessment of bat species richness in a targeted landscape. The present study could be used as a model approach to assess the biodiversity and demographics of other taxa and in other habitats.en_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.embargo2023-11-30
dc.description.librarianhj2023en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOppenheimer Generations and the South African National Research Foundation (NRF).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tafz20en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlexandra Howard, Ara Monadjem, Duncan MacFadyen & Christian T. Chimimba (2022) Testing the efficacy of bat monitoring methods for identification and species surveys in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa, African Zoology, 57:4, 180-194, DOI: 10.1080/15627020.2022.2138722.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1562-7020 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2224-073X (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/15627020.2022.2138722
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89922
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rights© Zoological Society of Southern Africa. This is an electronic version of an article published in African Zoology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 180-194, 2022. doi : 10.1080/15627020.2022.2138722. African Zoology is available online at : https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tafz20.en_US
dc.subjectChiropteraen_US
dc.subjectMaxenten_US
dc.subjectMorphometricsen_US
dc.subjectCytochrome ben_US
dc.subjectAnabaten_US
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_US
dc.subjectKwaZulu-Natal (KZN)en_US
dc.titleTesting the efficacy of bat monitoring methods for identification and species surveys in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africaen_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Howard_Testing_2022.pdf
Size:
1.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Howard_TestingSuppl_2022.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: