Assessing the insurmountable challenge in proving the existence of a customary marriage in terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the misplacing of gender inequality

dc.contributor.authorRadebe, Martha Keneilwe
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-04T11:21:05Z
dc.date.available2023-08-04T11:21:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 endeavoured, amongst other things, to alleviate the discriminatory and unequal treatment suffered by women in customary marriages. Women had grounds for celebration when the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act was finally enacted. The onus of proving the existence of a customary marriage still remains an insurmountable challenge and poses a threat of distorting African customs when courts attempt to ascertain the existence of a customary marriage. This challenge is reflected in the cases of Tsambo v Sengadi (244/19) [2020] ZASCA 46 (30 April 2020). Sengadi v Tsambo; In Re: Tsambo (40344/2018) [2018] ZAGPJHC 666; [2019] 1 All SA 569 (GJ) (8 November 2018). On 28 February 2016, Ms Sengadi and Mr Tsambo together with their families celebrated what was assumed to be a customary marriage. The Tsambo family furthermore on the abovementioned day welcomed Ms Sengadi as their bride and this according to the Sengadi family signified a handing over resulting in the conclusion of a valid customary marriage. The Tsambo family has however in the cases of Sengadi v Tsambo, and Tsambo v Sengadi, disputed the existence of a customary marriage and raised the argument that Ms Sengadi was not handed over to the Tsambo family in accordance with Setswana custom. Ms Sengadi now bears the onus to prove the existence of a valid customary marriage and this exposes the insurmountable challenge in establishing and ascertaining applicable contents of African custom. This paper seeks to assess the challenge in ascertaining the existence of a valid customary marriage and how African custom can be misplaced under the guise of gender equality with emphasis on how the handing over of the bride has been misplaced by courts in the Sengadi v Tsambo and Tsambo v Sengadi cases.en_US
dc.description.departmentPublic Lawen_US
dc.description.librarianam2023en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.dejure.up.ac.zaen_US
dc.identifier.citationRadebe, K.M. ‘Assessing the insurmountable challenge in proving the existence of a customary marriage in terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the misplacing of gender inequality’ 2022 De Jure Law Journal 77-86 http://dx.DOI.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2022/v55a5.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1466-3597 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2225-7160 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.17159/2225-7160/2022/v55a5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/91804
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPretoria University Law Pressen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.subjectCustomary marriageen_US
dc.subjectTsambo familyen_US
dc.subjectSetswana customen_US
dc.subjectAfrican customen_US
dc.subjectGender inequalityen_US
dc.subjectSDG-10: Reduced inequalitiesen_US
dc.subjectSDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutionsen_US
dc.titleAssessing the insurmountable challenge in proving the existence of a customary marriage in terms of section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the misplacing of gender inequalityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Radebe_Assessing_2022.pdf
Size:
476.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: