Tax research methodology for untested legislation : an exemplar for the tax scholar

dc.contributor.authorPidduck, Teresa Michelle
dc.contributor.emailteresa.pidduck@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T09:25:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionSome of the sections of this work are based on my thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Accounting at Rhodes University in 2018.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractTax scholars using typical doctrinal and reform-oriented methodologies often struggle to articulate the process undertaken in their research and at the same time, these methods often require an analysis of legislation that has already been the subject of judicial inquiry. However, this raises the challenge of what method to employ in the absence of such judicial inquiry. The tax environment has become so dynamic that law reform occurs rapidly and the law has to be researched, in the absence of case law post legislative amendment. This article provides tax scholars with a methodological approach described as a structured pre-emptive analysis that overcomes this problem (in other words an adaptation of typical doctrinal reform-oriented approaches). Using an exemplar of an actual tax law problem, the paper demonstrates how to conduct rigorous research in the absence of case law dealing with legislation that is the subject of enquiry. The article makes two contributions. First, it gives transparency to the traditional doctrinal reform-oriented methods primarily used in law. Second, it illustrates a method that can be used to overcome the absence of case law.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentTaxationen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2020-09-21
dc.description.librarianhj2020en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsar20en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationTeresa M. Pidduck (2019) Tax research methodology for untested legislation: An exemplar for the tax scholar, South African Journal of Accounting Research, 33:3, 205-219, DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2019.1662212.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1029-1954 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2376-3981 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/10291954.2019.1662212
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/73087
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherNISC Pty (Ltd) and Informa Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group)en_ZA
dc.rights© 2019 South African Journal of Accounting Research. This is an electronic version of an article published in South African Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 205-219, 2019. doi : 10.1080/10291954.2019.1662212. South African Journal of Accounting Research is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rsar20.en_ZA
dc.subjectDoctrinalen_ZA
dc.subjectMethodologyen_ZA
dc.subjectTaxen_ZA
dc.subjectQualitativeen_ZA
dc.subjectReform-orienteden_ZA
dc.titleTax research methodology for untested legislation : an exemplar for the tax scholaren_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pidduck_Tax_2019.pdf
Size:
338.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: