No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples

dc.contributor.authorLefevre, Carmen E.
dc.contributor.authorLewis, G.J.
dc.contributor.authorBates, T.C.
dc.contributor.authorDzhelyova, M.
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee, Vinet
dc.contributor.authorDeary, Ian J.
dc.contributor.authorPerrett, David Ian
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-12T06:13:37Z
dc.date.available2012-06-12T06:13:37Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractSexual dimorphism in physical appearance may be an important cue in both intra- and inter-sex competition. Recently, the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has been proposed as a novel sexually dimorphic morphologic measure, with men suggested to have a higher fWHR than women. Currently, however, the status of fWHR as a sexually dimorphic trait is unclear. Here we tested for sexual dimorphism in fWHR, as well as in three additional, previously reported, facial measures, in four (three Caucasian and one African) independent samples. In three of the four samples, no significant sex differences in fWHR were observed. In one sample males showed a significantly lower (rather than higher) fWHR than females (this effect was no longer significant after controlling for Body Mass Index). By contrast, significant and large sex differences were observed in all four samples for each of the three previously validated facial metrics; namely: (i) lower face/face height, (ii) cheekbone prominence, and (iii) face width/lower face height. These results provide strong evidence against the claim that fWHR, at least as measured from the surface of the face, is sexually dimorphic.en
dc.description.librariannf2012en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 is supported by funding from the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government (ETM/55). Ian Deary is supported by The University of Edinburgh Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, part of the cross council Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Initiative (G0700704/84698). Funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) is gratefully acknowledged.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/ensen_US
dc.identifier.citationLefevre, CE, Lewis, GJ, Bates, TC, Dzhelyova, M, Coetzee, V, Deary, IJ & Perrett, DI 2012, 'No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples', Evolution and Human Behavior, In Press.en
dc.identifier.issn1090-5138 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1879-0607 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/19149
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectSexual dimorphism in humansen
dc.subjectFacial width-to-height ratio (fWHR)en
dc.subject.lcshFace -- Sex differencesen
dc.subject.lcshFacial bones -- Measurementen
dc.titleNo evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samplesen
dc.typePostprint Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lefevre_No(2012).pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: