Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds

dc.contributor.authorUys, Petro E.
dc.contributor.authorEls, Pieter Schalk
dc.contributor.authorThoresson, Michael John
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-18T07:21:30Z
dc.date.available2007-07-18T07:21:30Z
dc.date.issued2007-04
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on an investigation to determine the spring and damper settings that will ensure optimal ride comfort of an off-road vehicle, on different road profiles and at different speeds. These settings are required for the design of a four stage semi-active hydro-pneumatic spring damper suspension system (4S4). Spring and damper settings in the 4S4 can be set either to the ride mode or the handling mode and therefore a compromise ride-handling suspension is avoided. The extent to which the ride comfort optimal suspension settings vary for roads of different roughness and varying speeds and the levels of ride comfort that can be achieved, are addressed. The issues of the best objective function to be used when optimising and if a single road profile and speed can be used as representative conditions for ride comfort optimisation of semi-active suspensions, are dealt with. Optimisation is performed with the Dynamic-Q algorithm on a Land Rover Defender 110 modelled in MSC.ADAMS software for speeds ranging from 10 to 50 km/h. It is found that optimising for a combined driver plus rear passenger seat weighted root mean square vertical acceleration rather than using driver or passenger values only, returns the best results. Results indicate that optimisation of suspension settings using one road and speed will improve ride comfort on the same road at different speeds. These settings will also improve ride comfort for other roads at the optimisation speed and other speeds, although not as much as when optimisation has been done for the particular road. For improved ride comfort damping generally has to be lower than the standard (compromised) setting, the rear spring as soft as possible and the front spring ranging from as soft as possible to stiffer depending on road and speed conditions. Ride comfort is most sensitive to a change in rear spring stiffness.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was made possible by the support of: • The Multi-disciplinary Design Optimisation Group (MDOG) of the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering of the University of Pretoria. • The European Research Office of the US Army under Contract No. N68171-01-M-5852. • The National Research Foundation of South Africa under contract TTK2004081000043.en
dc.format.extent1202533 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationUys, PE, Els, PS & Thoresson, M 2007, ‘Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds’, Journal of Terramechanics, vol.44, issue 2, pp. 163-175.[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00224898]en
dc.identifier.issn0022-4898
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jterra.2006.05.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/3060
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsElsevieren
dc.subjectRide comforten
dc.subjectOptimization techniquesen
dc.subjectRough roadsen
dc.subjectFour stage semi-active suspension systemen
dc.subjectSuspension of automobilesen
dc.subject.lcshOff-road vehicles -- Springs and suspensionen
dc.subject.lcshOff-road vehicles -- Handling characteristicsen
dc.subject.lcshHuman comforten
dc.titleSuspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speedsen
dc.typePostprint Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Uys_Suspension(2007).pdf
Size:
1.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.39 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: