Field evaluation of natural human odours and the biogent-synthetic lure in trapping Aedes aegypti, vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses in Kenya

dc.contributor.authorOwino, Eunice A.
dc.contributor.authorSang, Rosemary
dc.contributor.authorSole, Catherine L.
dc.contributor.authorPirk, Christian Walter Werner
dc.contributor.authorMbogo, Charles
dc.contributor.authorTorto, Baldwyn
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-13T07:08:55Z
dc.date.available2014-11-13T07:08:55Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-23
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Methods currently used in sampling adult Aedes aegypti, the main vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses are limited for effective surveillance of the vector and accurate determination of the extent of virus transmission during outbreaks and inter - epidemic periods. Here, we document the use of natural human skin odours in baited traps to improve sampling of adult Ae. aegypti in two different endemic areas of chikungunya and dengue in Kenya – Kilifi and Busia Counties. The chemistry of the volatiles released from human odours and the Biogent (BG)-commercial lure were also compared. METHODS: Cotton socks and T-shirts were used to obtain natural human skin volatiles from the feet and trunk of three volunteers (volunteers 1 and 2 in Kilifi and volunteers 2 and 3 in Busia). Using Latin square design, we compared the efficacies of BG sentinel traps baited with carbon dioxide plus (a) no bait, (b) human feet volatiles, (c) human trunk volatiles each against (c) a control (Biogent commercial lure) at the two sites. Coupled gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to identify and compare candidate attractants released by the commercial lure and human odours. RESULTS: Ae. aegypti captured in the trap baited with feet odours from volunteer 2 and trunk odours from the same volunteer were significantly higher than in the control trap in Busia and Kilifi respectively, [IRR = 5.63, 95% CI: 1.15 - 28.30, p = 0.030] and [IRR = 3.99, 95% CI: 0.95-16.69, p = 0.049]. At both sites, Ae. aegypti captures in traps baited with either the feet or trunk odours from volunteers 1 and 3 were not significantly different from the control. Major qualitative differences were observed between the chemical profiles of human odours and the commercial BG-lure. Aldehydes, fatty acids and ketones dominated human odour profiles, whereas the BG-lure released mainly hexanoic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that additional candidate attractants are present in human skin volatiles which can help to improve the efficacy of lures for trapping and surveillance of Ae. aegypti.en_US
dc.description.librarianam2014en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.parasitesandvectors.comen_US
dc.identifier.citationOwino, EA, Sang, R, Sole, CL, Pirk, C, Mbogo, C & Torto, B 2014, 'Field evaluation of natural human odours and the biogent-synthetic lure in trapping Aedes aegypti, vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses in Kenya', Parasites & Vectors, vol. 7, art. 451, pp. 1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1776-1042
dc.identifier.other10.1186/1756-3305-7-451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/42571
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rights© 2014 Owino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectAedes aegyptien_US
dc.subjectDengueen_US
dc.subjectChikungunyaen_US
dc.subjectHuman odouren_US
dc.subjectMosquitoen_US
dc.subjectTrapsen_US
dc.titleField evaluation of natural human odours and the biogent-synthetic lure in trapping Aedes aegypti, vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Owino_Field_2014.pdf
Size:
2.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: