Assessing reproductive performance to establish benchmarks for small-holder beef cattle herds in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorNkadimeng, Marble
dc.contributor.authorVan Marle-Koster, Este
dc.contributor.authorNengovhela, Nkhanedzeni Baldwin
dc.contributor.authorRamukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent
dc.contributor.authorMphaphathi, Masindi Lotus
dc.contributor.authorRust, Johannes Matthias
dc.contributor.authorMakgahlela, Mahlako Linah
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T13:08:19Z
dc.date.available2023-04-05T13:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-01
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: TABLE S1: Summary of the likelihood and variation of reproductive performance in smallholder beef cattle herds between provinces (Eastern Cape, Free State, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and North West). TABLE S2: Cow characteristics (breed, age, parity).en_US
dc.description.abstractSmallholder beef cattle farms in South Africa have had low reproductive performance, which has been associated with management practices. Considering current farm management practices, a multi-stage selection study was conducted to assess reproductive performance as defined by pregnancy rate, fetal and calf losses, calving interval and days open to benchmark reproductive performance. Data were collected twice, in autumn (March–May) for pregnancy diagnosis and in spring (September–November) for monitoring of confirmed pregnancies. Overall, 3694 cow records from 40 smallholder herds were collected during 2018 and 2019 breeding seasons from five provinces. The preferred 25th quartile described target performance and GLIMMIX procedure determined associations between management practices and performance. Smallholder farms on average recorded 50% pregnancy rate and 12% fetal and calf losses with 304 and 608 days open and calving interval, respectively. The derived target benchmarks for pregnancy rate, fetal and calf losses, days open and calving intervals in smallholder farms were 54%, 1.4%, 152 and 425 days, respectively. Reproductive performance was associated with no knowledge of body condition scoring before breeding, culling of old and non-productive cows, record keeping and low bull to cow ratio (p < 0.05). The performance benchmarks implied that industry averages may be improved if sustainable management services are provided through extension and advisory services.en_US
dc.description.departmentAnimal and Wildlife Sciencesen_US
dc.description.librarianam2023en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsen_US
dc.identifier.citationNkadimeng, M.; Van Marle-Köster, E.; Nengovhela, N.B.; Ramukhithi, F.V.; Mphaphathi, M.L.; Rust, J.M.; Makgahlela, M.L. Assessing Reproductive Performance to Establish Benchmarks for Small- Holder Beef Cattle Herds in South Africa. Animals 2022, 12, 3003. https://DOI.org/10.3390/ani12213003.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3390/ani12213003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/90382
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.en_US
dc.subjectCow fertilityen_US
dc.subjectManagement factorsen_US
dc.subjectPerformance benchmarksen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy rateen_US
dc.titleAssessing reproductive performance to establish benchmarks for small-holder beef cattle herds in South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nkadimeng_Assessing_2022.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nkadimeng_AssessingSuppl_2022.pdf
Size:
179.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: