The Corondimas principle is still alive and well :. Diggers Development (Pty) Ltd v City of Matlosana : Case no 824/2010. [2011] ZASCA 247

dc.contributor.authorLotz, D.J. (Dirk Johannes)
dc.contributor.authorNagel, C.J. (Christoffel Johannes), 1954-
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-12T06:28:31Z
dc.date.available2014-08-12T06:28:31Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractIt is a trite principle of the law of contract that a condition is an uncertain future event upon which either the commencement of the duty to perform or the contract’s continued existence is made dependent. The effect of a suspensive condition can be summarised as follows (see Otto and Prozesky-Kuschke “General principles of the law of contract” in Nagel (ed) Commercial law (2011) 114–115): A condition is suspensive when the right or duty to performance in terms of a contract is suspended or postponed pending (and thus made dependent upon) the occurrence or non-occurrence of an uncertain future event specified in the contract. Pending the fulfilment of the condition, a contractual relationship indeed exists between the parties. One of the consequences of the existence of a contractual relationship is that neither party can withdraw from the contract and that any additional duty must be performed. Upon fulfilment of the condition, the parties are entitled to performance and obliged to perform. Before fulfilment, performance may not be claimed. If the condition is not fulfilled, the contract is terminated and neither party has to perform. In addition, either party is entitled to the return of anything already performed (see also Hutchison and Pretorius (eds) The law of contract in South Africa (2009) 247–248; Van der Merwe et al Contract general principles (2007) 289–293; Van Rensburg et al “Contract” 5(1) LAWSA (2004) paras 436–437; Kerr The Principles of the law of contract (2002) 446–449 and Christie The law of contract in South Africa (2011) 145 and authorities cited).en_US
dc.description.librarianam2014en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.lexisnexis.co.zaen_US
dc.identifier.citationLotz, DJ & Nagel, CJ 2012, 'The Corondimas principle is still alive and well : Diggers Development (Pty) Ltd v City of Matlosana : Case no 824/2010. [2011] ZASCA 247', Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law/Tydskrif Vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 681-688.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1682-4490
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/41170
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLexisNexisen_US
dc.rightsLexisNexisen_US
dc.subjectLaw of contracten_US
dc.subjectTrite principleen_US
dc.subjectContractual relationshipen_US
dc.subjectTerminationen_US
dc.titleThe Corondimas principle is still alive and well :. Diggers Development (Pty) Ltd v City of Matlosana : Case no 824/2010. [2011] ZASCA 247en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lotz_Corondimas_2012.pdf
Size:
57.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: