Are fission–fusion dynamics consistent among populations? A large-scale study with Cape buffalo

dc.contributor.authorWielgus, Elodie
dc.contributor.authorCornelis, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDe Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel
dc.contributor.authorCain, Bradley
dc.contributor.authorFritz, Herve
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Eve
dc.contributor.authorValls-Fox, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorCaron, Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorChamaillé-Jammes, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-02T05:51:30Z
dc.date.available2020-10-02T05:51:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-09
dc.description.abstractFission–fusion dynamics allow animals to manage costs and benefits of group living by adjusting group size. The degree of intraspecific variation in fission–fusion dynamics across the geographical range is poorly known. During 2008–2016, 38 adult female Cape buffalo were equipped with GPS collars in three populations located in different protected areas (Gonarezhou National Park and Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe; Kruger National Park, South Africa) to investigate the patterns and environmental drivers of fission–fusion dynamics among populations. We estimated home range overlap and fission and fusion events between Cape buffalo dyads. We investigated the temporal dynamics of both events at daily and seasonal scales and examined the influence of habitat and distance to water on event location. Fission– fusion dynamics were generally consistent across populations: Fission and fusion periods lasted on average between less than one day and three days. However, we found seasonal differences in the underlying patterns of fission and fusion, which point out the likely influence of resource availability and distribution in time on group dynamics: During the wet season, Cape buffalo split and associated more frequently and were in the same or in a different subgroup for shorter periods. Cape buffalo subgroups were more likely to merge than to split in open areas located near water, but overall vegetation and distance to water were very poor predictors of where fission and fusion events occurred. This study is one of the first to quantify fission–fusion dynamics in a single species across several populations with a common methodology, thus robustly questioning the behavioral flexibility of fission–fusion dynamics among environments.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Instituteen_ZA
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2020en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, François Sommer Foundation and the French ANR.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.ecolevol.orgen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWielgus E., Cornélis D., De Garine- Wichatitsky M., et al. Are fission–fusion dynamics consistent among populations? A large-scale study with Cape buffalo. Ecology and Evolution 2020;10:9240–9256. https://DOI.org/ 10.1002/ece3.6608.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1002/ece3.6608
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/76310
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_ZA
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licenseen_ZA
dc.subjectAssociation patternsen_ZA
dc.subjectDyadic interactionsen_ZA
dc.subjectHome range overlapen_ZA
dc.subjectMulti-populationen_ZA
dc.subjectSeasonalityen_ZA
dc.subjectCape buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer)en_ZA
dc.subjectFission-fusion dynamicsen_ZA
dc.titleAre fission–fusion dynamics consistent among populations? A large-scale study with Cape buffaloen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wielgus_Are_2020.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: