Intertrochanteric femur fractures : a current concepts review

dc.contributor.authorSukati, Falethu M.
dc.contributor.authorViljoen, Jaco
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Alwich N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T12:11:32Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T12:11:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.description.abstractIntertrochanteric fractures are common injuries around the hip, especially among the elderly. With the rising incidence of these injuries, they are expected to double by 2050. Incidence rates are higher in females than males and in white patients than black African patients. Osteoporosis weakens the local trochanteric anatomic support leading to an increased susceptibility to fractures. Disruption of the posteromedial calcar region results in fracture instability. Optimal lag screw position and fracture reduction are significant determinants for postoperative outcomes. The tip apex distance and reduction criteria determine lag screw cut-out risk and fracture reduction quality, respectively. A calcar-referenced tip apex distance is comparable if not better than the tip apex distance in predicting cut-out risk. Optimal reduction is in slight valgus, a positive medial cortex apposition and smooth anterior cortex apposition. High mortality rates are observed with non-surgical treatment. Surgical management is therefore the gold standard for intertrochanteric fractures. Treatment options are categorised into extramedullary fixation, intramedullary fixation and proximal femur replacement. They include the dynamic hip screw (DHS), cephalomedullary nails (CMN) and arthroplasty. Although still in use, the proximal femur locking plate is falling out of favour due to high complication rates. Fracture stability and pattern influence the treatment choice. There is, however, a growing use of CMNs which has been attributed to surgical training background. Modification of older CMN designs has improved treatment outcomes. Systematic meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) do not show superiority of one treatment option over another; therefore, there is no consensus on the best treatment choice. The proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) has better outcomes compared to other fixation options with respect to intraoperative blood loss and Harris hip scores. As a group, CMNs have a better 120-day postoperative quality of life compared to the DHS. No significant difference in complications has been found between treatment options. In light of the anticipated increased incidence of intertrochanteric fracture, more work is needed in planning national resource allocation, devising preventative methods and improving clinical interventions in South Africa.en_US
dc.description.departmentOrthopaedic Surgeryen_US
dc.description.librarianam2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.saoj.org.za/index.php/saoj%20en_US
dc.identifier.citationSukati, F.M., Viljoen, J. & Alexander, A. Intertrochanteric femur fractures: a current concepts review. South African Orthopaedic Journal 2023;22(1):41-47. http://dx.DOI.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2023/v22n1a6.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1681-150X (print)
dc.identifier.issn2309-8309 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.17159/2309-8309/2023/v22n1a6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/94195
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedpharm Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© 2023 Sukati FM. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence.en_US
dc.subjectIntertrochanteric femur fractureen_US
dc.subjectArthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectDynamic hip screw (DHS)en_US
dc.subjectCephalomedullary nail (CMN)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.titleIntertrochanteric femur fractures : a current concepts reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sukati_Intertrochanteric_2023.pdf
Size:
492.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: