Glycemic control and cardiometabolic risk in black Zimbabweans with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

dc.contributor.authorChiveto, Dexter Tadiwanashe
dc.contributor.authorMusarurwa, Cuthbert
dc.contributor.authorMapira, Herbert T.
dc.contributor.authorKaseke, Farayi
dc.contributor.authorNyengerai, Tawanda
dc.contributor.authorKaseke, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorGori, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T10:17:08Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T10:17:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-08
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE : Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently presents with modified cardiometabolic risk profiles, indicative of an elevated susceptibility to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cardiometabolic risk factors such as obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia are known contributors to increased CVD hazard in individuals with T2DM. This study evaluated the glycemic control-based cardiometabolic risk profiles of black Zimbabweans with T2DM. PATIENTS AND METHODS : A cross-sectional study of 116 T2DM patients recruited from diabetic clinics at Parirenyatwa and Sally Mugabe Hospitals, Harare, Zimbabwe, was conducted. Blood samples were collected for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile assessment. The Framingham risk scores (FRS) based on body mass index (BMI) and lipid profile were used to determine CVD risk. Parametric variables were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni correction, while non-parametric variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc Dunn test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS : The overall frequency of dyslipidemia was 83.6% (n=97) and hypoalphalipoproteinemia was the most prevalent dyslipidemia (79.3%). Median HDLC levels were significantly lower in participants with poor glycemic control (1.12 mmol/L) compared to those with good glycemic control group (1.37 mmol/L) (p=0.011). Despite lack of significant variations in Framingham Risk Scores, there was a trend towards lower FRS-BMI in the good control group (29.8%) compared to the inadequate control (35.4%) and poor control (32.7%) groups (p=0.078). CONCLUSION : Duration since DM diagnosis was observed to be an important risk factor for poor glycemic control being significantly shorter in those with good glycemic control compared to those with inadequate and poor control. Overall, there was no significant difference in HbA1c status by age but individuals with poor glycemic control were significantly older than those with good control. The most prevalent dyslipidemia among the study participants was hypoalphalipoproteinemia which is reportedly associated with genetic predisposition, warranting further investigations.en_US
dc.description.departmentImmunologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.dovepress.com/diabetes-metabolic-syndrome-and-obesity-targets-and-therapy-journalen_US
dc.identifier.citationChiveto, D.T., Musarurwa, C., Mapira, H.T. et al. 2024, 'Glycemic control and cardiometabolic risk in black Zimbabweans with Type 2 diabetes mellitus', Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, vol. 17, pp. 3187-3196, doi : 10.2147/DMSO.S473042.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1178-7007 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.2147/DMSO.S473042
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/98566
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDove Medical Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Chiveto et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)en_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease (CVD)en_US
dc.subjectGlycated hemoglobinen_US
dc.subjectDyslipidemiaen_US
dc.subjectHypoalphalipoproteinemiaen_US
dc.subjectFramingham risk scoreen_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.titleGlycemic control and cardiometabolic risk in black Zimbabweans with Type 2 diabetes mellitusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chiveto_Glycemic_2024.pdf
Size:
883.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: