Is pelvic floor morphology a predictor of successful pessary retention? Original research and review of the literature

dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Frances
dc.contributor.authorAbdool, Zeelha
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-17T09:27:29Z
dc.date.available2019-07-17T09:27:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : Vaginal pessaries are known to be an effective treatment modality for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Pessaries form an important part of the physician’s armamentarium in the treatment of POP, but currently many of the factors affecting their successful use are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES : To determine the association between pessary retention (PR) at 1 year, and functional pelvic floor morphology, i.e. levator hiatal distance and area, and levator avulsion. METHODS : This retrospective study reviewed the records of 73 patients with symptomatic POP at a tertiary urogynaecological centre. This multi-ethnic cohort had previously been studied for pelvic-floor morphology, had had 4D transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound, and had opted for a vaginal pessary as a treatment option. RESULTS : Our population had a mean age of 59.4 (range 32 - 91) years, and mean body mass index of 29.4 (range 20 - 42) kg/m2, with a mean assessment of stage 3 in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantifications System (POP-Q). The level of prolapse was found to be related to PR (p=0.077). We further explored this concept using symmetric measures of association (γ=–0.353), indicating that PR decreases with increasing prolapse severity. PR was also found to be inversely associated with prior pelvic reconstructive surgery (n=63; p=0.055; γ=–0.417). There was a strong correlation that failed, however, to achieve significance by a small margin (p=0.052) between hiatal distance on contraction and PR. CONCLUSION : This study found an inverse relationship between PR and hiatal distance on contraction, prior pelvic surgery and the severity of prolapse. This was a pilot study with a limited number of participants, and the authors plan a prospective study to further clarify the association between long-term PR and functional pelvic floor morphology.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2019en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://sajog.org.za/index.php/SAJOGen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationPaterson, F.S. & Abdool, Z. 2018, 'Is pelvic floor morphology a predictor of successful pessary retention? Original research and review of the literature', South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1-5.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0038-2329 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.7196/SAJOG.2018.v24i3.1360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/70746
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherHealth and Medical Publishing Groupen_ZA
dc.rights© 2019, South African Medical Association. All rights reserved. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) .en_ZA
dc.subjectVaginal pessariesen_ZA
dc.subjectTreatmenten_ZA
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapse (POP)en_ZA
dc.subjectPessary retention (PR)en_ZA
dc.subjectLevator avulsionen_ZA
dc.subjectPelvic floor morphologyen_ZA
dc.titleIs pelvic floor morphology a predictor of successful pessary retention? Original research and review of the literatureen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Paterson_Is_2018.pdf
Size:
832.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: