The validity of the Big Five personality traits for job performance : meta-analyses of South African studies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Van Aarde, Ninette
Meiring, Deon
Wiernik, Brenton M.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Abstract

Previous meta-analyses have established the Big Five personality traits as important predictors of job performance around the globe. This study extends the international generalizability of Big Five criterion-related validity through systematic review and meta-analyses of personality–performance research conducted in South Africa. We meta-analyzed data from 33 studies and 6,782 individuals to estimate validities of Big Five traits for various job performance criteria. Results showed that the Big Five traits have similar validity for job performance criteria as found in other cultural contexts. Conscientiousness was the strongest predictor across performance criteria, while other traits showed validity for specific criteria or subsamples. Results demonstrate the importance of psychometric meta-analysis for building cumulative knowledge and support applied use of personality assessments in South Africa. Consistency of the results of this study with those of previous meta-analyses in other national contexts supports the argument that personality–performance relations are a cultural universal.

Description

This work is based on the Master's thesis by Ninette van Aarde. (http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53004)
A previous version of this paper was presented at the 18th Annual conference of the Society of Industrial-Organizational Psychology South Africa (SIOPSA), Pretoria, South Africa.

Keywords

Job performance, Personality, Training performance, Academic performance, Conscientiousness, Meta-analysis, South Africa (SA), Counterproductive work behaviors

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Van Aarde, N., Meiring, D. & Wiernik, B.M. 2017, 'The validity of the Big Five personality traits for job performance : meta-analyses of South African studies', International Journal of Selection and Assessment, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 223-239.