Validating measures of psychological well-being by contrasting samples employed in hazardous and less hazardous work
Loading...
Date
Authors
Strumpfer, Deo J.W. (Deodandus)
Eiselen, Riëtte J.
Meiring, Deon
Phalatse, Jack S
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elliot & Fitzpatrick
Abstract
The study investigated whether differences between contrasting groups reflect significant differences in psychological
well-being scores. Membership of hazardous vs. less hazardous occupations in the same profession served as proxy
measures of well-being. Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence (SOC), Block & Kremen’s Ego-resiliency, and Goldberg’s
Emotional Stability scales were validated. Study 1 compared mine rescue team members and ordinary miners (n = 34,
41) and Study 2 police special task force members and regular officers (n = 43, 41). In Study 1, SOC and job satisfaction
predicted group membership. In Study 2, satisfaction with life and extraversion scales predicted group membership, as
did SOC in a secondary analysis. The SOC scale could predict psychological well-being in hazardous work settings.
Description
Keywords
Ego-resiliency, Emotional stability
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Strumpfer, DJW, Eiselen, RJ, Meiring, D & Phalatse, JS 2010, 'Validating measures of psychological well-being by contrasting samples employed in hazardous and less hazardous work', Journal of Psychology in Africa, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23-32. [http://www.elliottfitzpatrick.com/jpa.html]