Mechanisms behind differential white grub host susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes

dc.contributor.authorKatumanyane, Agil
dc.contributor.authorSlippers, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorWondafrash, Mesfin
dc.contributor.authorMalan, Antoinette P.
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Brett Phillip
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-15T08:15:38Z
dc.date.available2024-02-15T08:15:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.description.abstractControl of white grubs, the sporadic root-feeding larvae of scarabid beetles, is difficult due to their cryptic nature and resistance to chemical insecticides. Potential exists for the use of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) for such control. The successful infection of white grubs by EPN, however, is limited by the white grubs’ innate reduced susceptibility in form of behavioural, morphological and physiological defences. This study aimed to determine the different physiological defence mechanisms of white grubs against attack by EPN. The white grub species, Pegylis sommeri and Schizonycha affinis, which were previously found to have a low level of susceptibility to EPN, and Maladera sp. 4, which had previously shown a relative high level of susceptibility, were examined. The ability of the EPN to penetrate the white grubs and of the EPN symbiotic bacteria to grow inside the insect haemolymph, the encapsulation rates, as well as the nematode growth inside the insect haemolymph, were determined. The results showed that the ability of the nematodes to penetrate white grubs, the encapsulation rates and growth in the haemolymph varied between EPN and white grub species. The different species of the EPN symbiotic bacteria were able to grow in the haemolymph of all the white grub species tested. The results indicate that the white grub species investigated tended to resist the initial penetration of most of the EPN studied, thus avoiding infection.en_US
dc.description.departmentBiochemistryen_US
dc.description.departmentForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI)en_US
dc.description.departmentGeneticsen_US
dc.description.departmentMicrobiology and Plant Pathologyen_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgNoneen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Tree Protection Cooperative Programme, TPCP, and the National Research Foundation of South Africa.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://brill.com/view/journals/nemy/nemy-overview.xmlen_US
dc.identifier.citationKatumanyane, A., Slippers, B., Wondafrash, M., Malan, A. P., & Hurley, B. P. (2023). Mechanisms behind differential white grub host susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes. Nematology, 25(7), 749-760. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-bja10253.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1388-5545 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1568-5411 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1163/15685411-bja10253
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/94632
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrill Academic Publishersen_US
dc.rightsBrill Academic Publishersen_US
dc.subjectWhite grubsen_US
dc.subjectEncapsulationen_US
dc.subjectPegylis sommerien_US
dc.subjectScarabaeidaeen_US
dc.subjectSchizonycha affinisen_US
dc.subjectWhite grub immunityen_US
dc.subjectEntomopathogenic nematodes (EPN)en_US
dc.titleMechanisms behind differential white grub host susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodesen_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Katumanyane_Mechanisms_2023.pdf
Size:
1.31 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: