Antimicrobial usage in pig production : effects on Escherichia coli virulence profiles and antimicrobial resistance

dc.contributor.authorAbubakar, Rukayya Hussain
dc.contributor.authorMadoroba, Evelyn
dc.contributor.authorAdebowale, Oluwawemimo Oluseun
dc.contributor.authorFasanmi, Olubunmi Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorFasina, Folorunso Oludayo
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T14:56:58Z
dc.date.available2020-08-13T14:56:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.description.abstractAntimicrobials (AM) are used for growth promotion and therapy in pig production. Its misuse has led to the development of resistant organisms. We evaluated Escherichia coli virulence genes, and compared phenotypic–genotypic antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns of faecal E. coli from pigs receiving routine farm treatment without antimicrobial agents against pigs treated routinely with AM over 70 days. Recovered E. coli were tested for AMR using disk diffusion and polymerase chain reaction. Virulence genes were detected in 24.8% of isolates from antimicrobial group and 43.5% from non-antimicrobial group (p = 0.002). The proportion of virulence genes heat-stable enterotoxins a & b (STa, STb), enteroaggregative heat stable enterotoxin 1 [EAST1] and Shiga toxin type 2e [Stx2e]) were 18.1%, 0.0%, 78.7% and 3.0% for antimicrobial group and 14.8%, 8.5%, 85.1% and 12.7% for non-antimicrobial groups, respectively. Resistance to oxytetracycline was most common (p = 0.03) in samples collected between days 10 and 21. Resistance shifted to amoxicillin on days 56–70, and trimethoprim resistance was observed throughout. Seventeen phenotypic AMR combinations were observed and eight were multidrug resistant. At least one tetracycline resistance gene was found in 63.9% of the isolates. tet (A) (23.3%) was most common in the antimicrobial group, whereas tet (B) (43.5%) was prevalent in the nonantimicrobial group. Usage or non-usage of antimicrobial agents in growing pigs does not preclude virulence genes development and other complex factors may be involved as previously described. Heavily used AM correspond to the degree of resistance and tetracycline resistance genes were detected during the growth phase.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentProduction Animal Studiesen_ZA
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_ZA
dc.description.librarianpm2020en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Research Foundation Incentive Funding for Rated Researchers (IPRR) and the University of Pretoria Postgraduate Bursary.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.ojvr.orgen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationAbubakar, R.H., Madoroba, E., Adebowale, O., Fasanmi, O.G. & Fasina, F.O., 2019, ‘Antimicrobial usage in pig production: Effects on Escherichia coli virulence profiles and antimicrobial resistance’, Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 86(1), a1743. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v86i1.1743.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0030-2465 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2219-0635 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4102/ojvr.v86i1.1743
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/75703
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherAOSIS OpenJournalsen_ZA
dc.rights© 2019. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_ZA
dc.subjectEscherichia colien_ZA
dc.subjectMicrobial drug resistanceen_ZA
dc.subjectVirulenceen_ZA
dc.subjectAntimicrobial usageen_ZA
dc.subjectPig productionen_ZA
dc.subjectAntimicrobial resistance (AMR)en_ZA
dc.titleAntimicrobial usage in pig production : effects on Escherichia coli virulence profiles and antimicrobial resistanceen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abubakar_Antimicrobial_2019.pdf
Size:
973.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: