Tenant mix in shopping centres: South Africa and the United Kingdom compared

dc.contributor.authorKyriaziz, A.N.
dc.contributor.authorCloete, C.E. (Christiaan Ernst)
dc.contributor.emailchris.cloete@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-12T08:36:58Z
dc.date.available2018-03-12T08:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.description.abstractThe management of tenant mix by shopping centre managers in South Africa was compared with that found to have been used by shopping centre managers in the UK (Downie et al., 2002). Relevant aspects included how to maintain an effective mix, the factors influencing the location of tenants, the extent that tenant mix policies are documented by property asset managers and the monitoring of tenant mix. A total of twenty re-sponses were received from leasing executives (letting agents), retail asset managers, investors, centre managers and property managers in South Africa, representing shopping centers totaling more than 1, 25 million square meters GLA. The study found that similar levels of importance were given to each aspect by respondents in both the countries. In both studies, anchor tenants were seen to be the most important factor of determining tenant mix and the image of a shopping centre. In the UK retail store specialists played a more dominant role than in South Africa in influencing the shopping centre tenant mix decision and the location of stores within the shopping centre. The lack of required unit sizes and vacant units was found to be the greatest hindrance to the updating of the tenant mix in both studies. A formal tenant mix policy updated on a frequent basis was found to be a determining factor in the keeping the tenant mix relevant and reflecting modern retail trends. The monitoring of turnover by evaluating monthly turnover figures or accessing a turnover index on a monthly or yearly basis was seen as the most important tool to monitoring, and thereby managing, the effectiveness of the tenant mix. The study provides guidelines to owners, asset managers, managers and investors in South African shop-ping centers on commonly accepted techniques to maintain a satisfactory tenant mix.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentConstruction Economicsen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2018en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.jbrmr.comen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationKyriazis, A.N. & Cloete, C.E. 2018, 'Tenant mix in shopping centres: South Africa and the United Kingdom compared', Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 152-162.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1751-8202
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/64200
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherAcademy of Business and Retail Managementen_ZA
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 unported (CC BY 3.0) .en_ZA
dc.subjectTenant mixen_ZA
dc.subjectShopping centreen_ZA
dc.subjectMonitor tenant mixen_ZA
dc.subjectProperty asset managersen_ZA
dc.subjectTenant locationen_ZA
dc.subjectTenant mix policiesen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_ZA
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom (UK)en_ZA
dc.titleTenant mix in shopping centres: South Africa and the United Kingdom compareden_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kyriazis_Tenant_2017.pdf
Size:
481.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: