Horizon scanning for South African biodiversity : a need for social engagement as well as science

dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Colleen L.
dc.contributor.authorGillson, Lindsey
dc.contributor.authorChild, Matthew F.
dc.contributor.authorTolley, Krystal A.
dc.contributor.authorCurie, Jock C.
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva, Jessica M.
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Graham J.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Pippin
dc.contributor.authorDowns, Colleen T.
dc.contributor.authorEgoh, Benis N.
dc.contributor.authorEhlers Smith, David A.
dc.contributor.authorEhlers Smith, Yvette C.
dc.contributor.authorEsler, Karen J.
dc.contributor.authorO’Farrell, Patrick J.
dc.contributor.authorSkowno, Andrew L.
dc.contributor.authorSuleman, Essa
dc.contributor.authorVeldtman, Ruan
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-29T05:48:44Z
dc.date.available2021-10-29T05:48:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractA horizon scan was conducted to identify emerging and intensifying issues for biodiversity conservation in South Africa over the next 5–10 years. South African biodiversity experts submitted 63 issues of which ten were identified as priorities using the Delphi method. These priority issues were then plotted along axes of social agreement and scientific certainty, to ascertain whether issues might be “simple” (amenable to solutions from science alone), “complicated” (socially agreed upon but technically complicated), “complex” (scientifically challenging and significant levels of social disagreement) or “chaotic” (high social disagreement and highly scientifically challenging). Only three of the issues were likely to be resolved by improved science alone, while the remainder require engagement with social, economic and political factors. Fortunately, none of the issues were considered chaotic. Nevertheless, strategic communication, education and engagement with the populace and policy makers were considered vital for addressing emerging issues.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Instituteen_ZA
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe South African National Biodiversity Instituteen_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://link.springer.com/journal/13280en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationSeymour, C.L., Gillson, L., Child, M.F. et al. Horizon scanning for South African biodiversity: A need for social engagement as well as science. Ambio 49, 1211–1221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01252-4.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0044-7447 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1654-7209 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s13280-019-01252-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/82280
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSpringeren_ZA
dc.rights© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019. The original publication is available at : http://link.springer.comjournal/13280.en_ZA
dc.subjectBiodiversity futuresen_ZA
dc.subjectConsensus and scientific knowledgeen_ZA
dc.subjectDelphi approachen_ZA
dc.subjectFuture scenariosen_ZA
dc.subjectStep changesen_ZA
dc.subjectThreats and opportunitiesen_ZA
dc.titleHorizon scanning for South African biodiversity : a need for social engagement as well as scienceen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Seymour_Horizon_2020.pdf
Size:
261.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: