The grey line in-between the rainbow : (re)thinking and (re)talking critical race theory in post-apartheid legal and social discourse
| dc.contributor.author | Modiri, Joel Malesela | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-15T06:32:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-15T06:32:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.description.abstract | All I’m saying is that even if they tried, the constitutional dispensation that they [the ANC] have negotiated for and have accepted and are not testing is anti-Black. [I]n a racially structured polity, the only people who can find it psychologically possible to deny the centrality of race are those who are racially privileged, for whom race is invisible precisely because the world is structured around them. Nothing will be reconciled in the time of reconciliation. | en |
| dc.description.librarian | nf2012 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Modiri, JSM 2011, 'The grey line in-between the rainbow : (re)thinking and (re)talking critical race theory in post-apartheid legal and social discourse', SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 177-201. | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0258-6568 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18444 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The Verloren van Themaat Centre for Public Law Studies, UNISA | en_US |
| dc.rights | The Verloren van Themaat Centre for Public Law Studies, UNISA | en |
| dc.subject | Critical race theory (CRT) | en |
| dc.subject | Critical legal discourse (CLS) | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Racism -- South Africa | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Post-apartheid era -- South Africa | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Constitutional law -- South Africa | en |
| dc.title | The grey line in-between the rainbow : (re)thinking and (re)talking critical race theory in post-apartheid legal and social discourse | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |