Diseases of livestock in the Pacific Islands region : setting priorities for food animal biosecurity

dc.contributor.authorBrioudes, Aurélie
dc.contributor.authorWarner, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.authorHedlefs, Robert
dc.contributor.authorGummow, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-02T08:07:39Z
dc.date.available2015-02-02T08:07:39Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.description.abstractMost Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs) have developing economies and face a critical shortage of veterinarians with limited financial resources allocated to their animal disease surveillance programmes. Thus, animal health authorities have to set priorities for better focusing their scarce resources. The main objective of this study was to identify animal diseases perceived to be of importance by decision makers within selected PICTs, at the regional and national levels, to ensure better targeting of animal health resources. A second objective was to investigate whether the targeted surveillance programmes resulting from this rationalized approach would also benefit the local communities engaged in livestock production. A multi-criteria prioritization process was developed, involving local experts, to score and rank 132 animal diseases based on their priority at the regional and national levels for four PICTs: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu, which form part of a regional Food Animal Biosecurity Network. In parallel interviews with farmers and field animal health and production workers were conducted to assess their perception of animal diseases. The list of the top-twenty ranked diseases for the Pacific Islands region shows a mix of endemic zoonotic diseases (such as leptospirosis ranked first; brucellosis third; tuberculosis sixth; and endoparasites and ectoparasites, respectively eleventh and thirteenth) with exotic diseases (such as HPAI ranked second, FMD fifth, and rabies ninth). There were different disease ranking lists for each of the four targeted PICTs, confirming different strategies of disease prevention and control may be required for each country, rather than a regional approach. Interviewed animal health and production workers were unfamiliar with most of the prioritized diseases and a majority acknowledged that they would not be able to recognize clinical signs if outbreaks were to occur in their area. Leptospirosis, which is endemic and identified as the top priority disease at the regional level, was never mentioned by any interviewed farmer. Farmers did not name any emerging infectious diseases as priorities. Instead, they identified endemic diseases (parasites, flu, coccidiosis, and scabies) as the most important. While animal disease priorities appear to differ widely between the targeted regions and countries, it also varies significantly between experts and farmers. Better targeted surveillance programmes may thus result in more rational and transparent allocation of resources, and thus enhanced food security, but may not directly match the needs of the local communities.en_ZA
dc.description.librarianhj2015en_ZA
dc.description.librarianes2025en
dc.description.sdgSDG-01: No povertyen
dc.description.sdgSDG-02: Zero hungeren
dc.description.sdgSDG-08: Decent work and economic growthen
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Public Sector Linkages Program, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of the Australian government (AUSAID AGREEMENT 54828/16) .en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/actatropicaen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBrioudes, A, Warner, J, Hedlefs, R & Gummow, B 2015, 'Diseases of livestock in the Pacific Islands region : setting priorities for food animal biosecurity', Acta Tropica, vol. 143, pp. 66-76.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0001-706X (print)
dc.identifier.issn1873-6254 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.12.012
dc.identifier.other7003908833
dc.identifier.otherN-9314-2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/43515
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.relation.requiresAdobe Acrobat Readeren
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Acta Tropica. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Acta Tropica, vol. 143, pp. 66-76. 2015. doi : 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.12.012.en_ZA
dc.subjectPacific Island countries and territories (PICTs)en_ZA
dc.subjectTropical diseasesen_ZA
dc.subjectPrioritizationen_ZA
dc.subjectAnimal healthen_ZA
dc.subjectLivestocken_ZA
dc.subjectFood animal biosecurityen_ZA
dc.subject.otherVeterinary science articles SDG-01en_ZA
dc.subject.otherVeterinary science articles SDG-02en_ZA
dc.subject.otherVeterinary science articles SDG-08en_ZA
dc.subject.otherSDG-01: No poverty
dc.subject.otherSDG-02: Zero hunger
dc.subject.otherSDG-08: Decent work and economic growth
dc.titleDiseases of livestock in the Pacific Islands region : setting priorities for food animal biosecurityen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brioudes_Diseases_2015.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: