A genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticks

dc.contributor.authorMarima, J.K.
dc.contributor.authorNel, C.L.
dc.contributor.authorMarufu, Munyaradzi Christopher
dc.contributor.authorJonsson, N.N.
dc.contributor.authorDube, B.
dc.contributor.authorDzama, K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-01T10:21:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-04
dc.description.abstractHost resistance to ticks can be explored as a possible approach of combating tick infestations to complement the existing unsustainable tick control methods. Thirty-six beef cattle animals were used, consisting of Angus, Brahman and Nguni breeds, with each breed contributing 12 animals. Half of the animals per breed were artificially challenged with Rhipicephalus microplus and the other half with R. decoloratus unfed larvae per animal. Skin biopsies and blood samples were collected pre-infestation and 12 h post-infestation from the feeding sites of visibly engorging ticks. The success rate of the ticks was high and had an influence even at the early time point. Increased lymphocytes and blood urea nitrogen levels as well as decreased levels of segmented neutrophils were observed in the Angus, which were the opposite of those in the Brahman and Nguni. The increase in cholesterol, which was highest in the Angus and lowest in the Nguni, may be due to altered protein metabolism. The expression profiles of genes TRAF6, TBP, LUM and B2M were significantly different among breeds. Five genes (CCR1, TLR5, TRAF6, TBP, BDA20) had increased or constant expression post-infestation, whereas the expression of CXCL8, IL-10 and TNF-α decreased or remained the same after tick challenge. Genes that showed variation are involved in discouraging long-term supply of blood meal to the tick and those associated with immune responses. The gene LUM is a potential biomarker for tick resistance in cattle. The response to infestation by the breeds was consistent across the tick species.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2021-03-07
dc.description.librarianhj2020en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Research Foundation (NRF) (Grant No. 94606). The operational costs were subsidized by Stellenbosch University and the Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production (ARC-API).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://link.springer.com/journal/10493en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMarima, J.K., Nel, C.L., Marufu, M.C. et al. A genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticks. Experimental and Applied Acarology volume 80, 569–590 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00480-8.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0168-8162 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1572-9702 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10493-020-00480-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/76286
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSpringeren_ZA
dc.rights© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. The original publication is available at : http://link.springer.comjournal/10493.en_ZA
dc.subjectTick-resistanceen_ZA
dc.subjectGene expressionen_ZA
dc.subjectSerum biochemistryen_ZA
dc.subjectHaematologyen_ZA
dc.titleA genetic and immunological comparison of tick-resistance in beef cattle following artificial infestation with Rhipicephalus ticksen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Marima_Genetic_2020.pdf
Size:
2.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: