The divergent approaches of English and South African courts, when considering actuarial expert testimony in the matter of an award for damages for future loss of earnings after a damage-causing event

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Du Plessis, Hendrik Lourens Marthinus

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Abstract

This paper analyses the driving forces behind the willingness of South African courts to hear actuarial expert testimony in even the most simple of cases, in contrast to the more circumspect approach of the English courts, when assessing the damages arising out of future loss of earnings following a damage-causing incident. The analysis may well add insight to members of other professions and scientific communities that provide expert testimony to the courts. It is argued that English substantive law of damages and those influenced by its application have something to gain from a consideration of the approach in South Africa.

Description

Keywords

Quantum of damages, Future pecuniary loss, Expert actuarial evidence, Expert testimony, Damages for future loss of earnings, Damages for future pecuniary losses, Multiplier-multiplicand method

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Du Plessis, HLM 2011, 'The divergent approaches of English and South African courts, when considering actuarial expert testimony in the matter of an award for damages for future loss of earnings after a damage-causing event', Annals of Actuarial Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5-22.