UPSpace will be temporarily unavailable tonight from 19:00 to 23:00 (South African Time) due to scheduled maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding
 

The effectiveness of the product liability regime in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 in South Africa : a comparative analysis with Australia

dc.contributor.advisorBarnard, Jacolien
dc.contributor.coadvisorKuschke, Birgit
dc.contributor.emailbertlouw16@gmail.comen_ZA
dc.contributor.postgraduateLouw, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T12:31:23Z
dc.date.available2021-12-20T12:31:23Z
dc.date.created2022-04-15
dc.date.issued2021-10-19
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (LLM (Mercantile Law))--University of Pretoria, 2021.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractProduct liability arising from the harm caused by a defective product being supplied to a consumer, is currently and has historically been a pressing concern within the South African consumer context. The establishment of this liability has previously been catered for in terms of the South African common law, either in terms of the law of Delict or via principles captured within contract law. The evident practical flaws of establishing product liability in terms of the common law, coupled with the new Constitutional dispensation, urged the South African legislature in promulgating and implementing the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”) and specifically introducing the so called ‘strict’ product liability regime as captured within section 61 of the CPA. The primary difference between this method of product liability establishment and the method captured within the common law, is that fault is now not required to be proven on behalf of the ‘supplier’ (party to the supply chain) for product liability to ensue. Although this newly originated ‘strict’ product liability regime as captured within section 61 of the CPA has alleviated the primary common law burdens of establishing product liability, it still has evidential practical flaws and obstacles, which impair both the application and effectiveness of the CPA. This dissertation will seek to determine whether this newly introduced ‘strict’ product liability regime is in fact effective or not. The past and present positions governing product liability in South Africa will be critically examined and analyzed, in determining the current position’s effectiveness. Additionally, the Australian position on product liability will be consulted, in order to draw possible recommendations as to alleviate the current South African position’s practical flaws.en_ZA
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_ZA
dc.description.degreeLLM (Mercantile Law)en_ZA
dc.description.departmentLLM Mercantile Lawen_ZA
dc.identifier.citation*en_ZA
dc.identifier.otherA2022en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/83094
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2019 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectAdvanced Consumer Protection Lawen_ZA
dc.subjectMercantile Lawen_ZA
dc.subjectAdvanced Consumer Protection Law
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleThe effectiveness of the product liability regime in terms of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 in South Africa : a comparative analysis with Australiaen_ZA
dc.typeMini Dissertationen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Louw_Effectiveness_2021.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: