Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a non-living anthrax vaccine versus a live spore vaccine with simultaneous penicillin-G treatment in cattle

dc.contributor.authorJauro, Solomon
dc.contributor.authorNdumnego, Okechukwu C.
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Charlotte Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorBuys, Angela
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorVan Heerden, Henriette
dc.contributor.emailhenriette.vanheerden@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T12:08:16Z
dc.date.available2021-10-19T12:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-09
dc.descriptionSupplementary Data: Table S1. The Anti-recombinant protective antigen (rPA) and anti-formalin inactivated spores (FIS) IgG titres (log10) in cattle vaccinated at weeks 0 and 3 and measured at weeks 0, 3, and 5 (with means and standard deviations). Cattle were vaccinated twice (weeks 0 and 3) with purified rPA (PrPA) + FIS + Pen-G (penicillin-G), crude rPA (CrPA) + FIS + Pen-G, SLSV + FIS + Pen-G, SLSV and NegCtl + PenG(vaccinated with Emulsigen-D®/Alhydrogel® plus Pen-G), Table S2. The anti-recombinant protective antigen (rPA) and anti-formalin inactivate Bacillus anthracis 34F2 spores (FIS) titres (log10) of di erent isotypes in vaccinated cattle (with means and standard deviations) of immunoglobulin isotypes titre of vaccinated cattle measured at weeks 0, 3 (two weeks after first vaccination) and 5 (two weeks after second vaccination).en_ZA
dc.description.abstractSterne live spore vaccine (SLSV) is the current veterinary anthrax vaccine of choice. Unlike the non-living anthrax vaccine (NLAV) prototype, SLSV is incompatible with concurrent antibiotics use in an anthrax outbreak scenario. The NLAV candidates used in this study include a crude recombinant protective antigen (CrPA) and a purified recombinant protective antigen (PrPA) complemented by formalin-inactivated spores and Emulsigen-D®/Alhydrogel® adjuvants. Cattle were vaccinated twice (week 0 and 3) with NLAVs plus penicillin-G (Pen-G) treatment and compared to cattle vaccinated twice with SLSV alone and with Pen-G treatment. The immunogenicity was assessed using ELISA against rPA and FIS, toxin neutralisation assay (TNA) and opsonophagocytic assay. The protection was evaluated using an in vivo passive immunisation mouse model. The anti-rPA IgG titres for NLAVs plus Pen-G and SLSV without Pen-G treatment showed a significant increase, whereas the titres for SLSV plus Pen-G were insignificant compared to pre-vaccination values. A similar trend was measured for IgM, IgG1, and IgG2 and TNA titres (NT50) showed similar trends to anti-rPA titres across all vaccine groups. The anti-FIS IgG and IgM titres increased significantly for all vaccination groups at week 3 and 5 when compared to week 0. The spore opsonising capacity increased significantly in the NLAV vaccinated groups including Pen-G treatment and the SLSV without Pen-G but much less in the SLSV group with Pen-G treatment. Passive immunization of A/J mice challenged with a lethal dose of 34F2 spores indicated significant protective capacity of antibodies raised in the SLSV and the PrPA + FIS + adjuvants vaccinated and Pen-G treated groups but not for the NLAV with the CrPA + FIS + adjuvants and the SLSV vaccinated and Pen-G treated group. Our findings indicate that the PrPA + FIS + Emulsigen-D®/Alhydrogel® vaccine candidate may provide the same level of antibody responses and protective capacity as the SLSV. Advantageously, it can be used concurrently with Penicillin-G in an outbreak situation and as prophylactic treatment in feedlots and valuable breeding stocks.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2021en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipTechnology Innovation Agency (TIA) and National Research Foundation (NRF) South Africa. The publication cost was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.mdpi.com/journal/vaccinesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationJauro, S., Ndumnego, O.C., Ellis, C. et al. 2020, 'Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a non-living anthrax vaccine versus a live spore vaccine with simultaneous penicillin-G treatment in cattle', Vaccines, vol. 8, art. 595, pp. 1-16.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2076-393X (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3390/vaccines8040595
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/82184
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherMDPIen_ZA
dc.rights© 2020 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.en_ZA
dc.subjectAnthraxen_ZA
dc.subjectAnimal vaccinationen_ZA
dc.subjectNon-living vaccineen_ZA
dc.subjectSterne live spore vaccine (SLSV)en_ZA
dc.subjectVeterinary anthrax vaccineen_ZA
dc.subjectCrude recombinant protective antigen (CrPA)en_ZA
dc.subjectNon-living anthrax vaccine (NLAV)en_ZA
dc.subjectPurified recombinant protective antigen (PrPA)en_ZA
dc.titleImmunogenicity and protective efficacy of a non-living anthrax vaccine versus a live spore vaccine with simultaneous penicillin-G treatment in cattleen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jauro_Immunogenicity_2020.pdf
Size:
11.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jauro_Immunogenicity_AddfileSupplData_2020.pdf
Size:
260.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
AddfileSuppl

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: