The distinction between story and discourse in the analysis of biblical narrative

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Van der Bergh, Ronald Henry

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Stellenbosch University: Department of Ancient Studies

Abstract

The distinction between story and discourse has become all but canonical in narratology. This article investigates the viability of this approach with reference to the narratological analysis of biblical narratives. It is shown that the distinction is indeed necessary, although the traditional approach should be modified. Discourse, rather than story, should be the starting point of any narratological analysis. This leads to the concept of an “implied story, which can be used as an analytical tool in the analysis of narrative. Special attention is given to the application of this new approach to biblical narrative, with an example drawn from a comparison of Isa 36:1-22 and 2 Kgs 18:13-37.

Description

This article is a revised version of a chapter of the author’s thesis submitted to the Ancient Languages Department of the University of Pretoria in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree in Ancient Languages and Cultures. The study was supervised by Prof. G T M Prinsloo.

Keywords

Story and discourse, Narratological analysis, Biblical narratives

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Van der Bergh, R 2008, 'The distinction between story and discourse in the analysis of biblical narrative', Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 83-98.