Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilege

dc.contributor.advisorKlein, A.E. (Abraham Eduard)
dc.contributor.coadvisorTerblanche, Hettie
dc.contributor.emailKubashni.moodley@pkf.co.zaen_US
dc.contributor.postgraduateMoodley, Kubashni
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-12T08:46:43Z
dc.date.available2014-08-12T08:46:43Z
dc.date.created2014-04-01
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.descriptionDissertation (Mcom)--University of Pretoria, 2013.en_US
dc.description.abstractSouth African taxpayers currently consult either accountants (i.e., non-legal tax practitioners) or attorneys (i.e., legal tax practitioners) in order to acquire tax advice. The qualitative approach adopted in carrying out this study entails the examination of the differing rights applicable to a taxpayer depending on which adviser he decides to approach for tax advice. The concept of legal professional privilege is a common law right which has only ever been applicable to members of the legal profession. However, due to the recent regulation of tax practitioners and the modernisation of the way taxpayers conduct their financial affairs in approaching both attorneys and accountants for tax advice it seems appropriate that this privilege should be extended beyond the legal profession. Upon consideration of the history and requirements of this privilege it is determined that this privilege is amenable to extension. Constitutional principles, with regard to the right to privacy and the right to equality in relation to the taxpayer obtaining the tax advice, are infringed as a result of the limitation imposed whereby only tax advice obtained from an attorney is protected. Lastly, the current legislative stances adopted by foreign jurisdictions, that currently permit or are considering permitting legal professional privilege to apply to tax advice obtained from non-legal tax practitioners illustrate that there is a global movement toward removing the current restrictions on this principle. This has been accomplished by countries such as the United States of America and New Zealand by way of introduction of statutory provisions that allow for tax advice issued by non-legal tax practitioners to be protected from disclosure to the revenue authorities in the respective countries. Based on the research conducted it is concluded that South Africa should therefore follow suit and create a separate statutory provision to protect tax advice obtained from non-legal tax practitioners.en_US
dc.description.availabilityunrestricteden_US
dc.description.departmentTaxationen_US
dc.identifier.citationMoodley, K 2014, Encompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privelege. MCom dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183>en_US
dc.identifier.otherF14/4/404/lmen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/41183
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoriaen_ZA
dc.rights© 2014 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.en_US
dc.subjectTax practitionersen_US
dc.subjectTaxationen_US
dc.subjectLegal professional privilegeen_US
dc.subjectNon-legal tax practitionersen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional issuesen_US
dc.subjectUCTDen_US
dc.titleEncompassing non-legal tax practitioners in South Africa within the ambit of legal professional privilegeen_US
dc.typeMini Dissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Moodley_Encompassing_2014.pdf
Size:
809.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: