Repositioning a country for global manufacturing competitiveness : a case of South Africa

dc.contributor.authorGates, Gareth Earle
dc.contributor.authorAdetunji, Olufemi
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T06:55:55Z
dc.date.available2021-01-15T06:55:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-01
dc.descriptionAppendix 1: Figure A1. MCI sub-indices and their measurement items. Appendix 2: Figure A2. Proposed alignment of the MCI framework used with the Porter’s diamond modelen_ZA
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE : This study aims to develop an artifact to measure the level of manufacturing competitiveness of a country in the global context and provide a suitable interpretation mechanism for the measured values, and to provide prescriptive solution where necessary so that the country can develop an actionable plan of program to move from the current level of global competitiveness to another such that they could provide more economic opportunities for their citizenry. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH : A manufacturing competitive index (MCI) was developed which includes relevant variables to capture a country’s manufacturing activity level in an economy with a balanced perspective. Reliable international sources were used. Ward algorithm was used to identify clear clusters of performance upon which competitive gaps were measured and improvement projects were identified and prioritized to obtain the best value for cluster transitional plan. FINDINGS : This study shows that the case country is not doing as well as it wants to believe, even when the relevant technology import measures were included in the expanded metric, but also, the next level of competitiveness is achievable within the national budget if proper prioritization is done. ORIGINALITY/VALUE : The paper presents a cocktail of indexes that is more exhaustive of MCI, including both research capacity and technology import variables. It also uses clustering mechanism to provide a proper context to interpret the MCI scores in the context of peer nations. It presents a gap determination methodology and shows how priority projects could be logically selected to close measured gaps based on anticipated value from budget expensesen_ZA
dc.description.departmentIndustrial and Systems Engineeringen_ZA
dc.description.librarianhj2020en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/cren_ZA
dc.identifier.citationGates, G.E. and Adetunji, O. (2020), "Repositioning a country for global manufacturing competitiveness: a case of South Africa", Competitiveness Review, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 151-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2018-0058.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1059-5422
dc.identifier.other10.1108/CR-09-2018-0058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/78043
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherEmeralden_ZA
dc.rights© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limiteden_ZA
dc.subjectCompetitivenessen_ZA
dc.subjectValue analysisen_ZA
dc.subjectGap analysisen_ZA
dc.subjectGlobal manufacturingen_ZA
dc.subjectPorter’s diamond modelen_ZA
dc.subjectWard clustering algorithmen_ZA
dc.titleRepositioning a country for global manufacturing competitiveness : a case of South Africaen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gates_Repositioning_2020.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gates_RepositioningApp_2020.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Appendix

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: