Cost-effectiveness of automated digital microscopy for diagnosis of active tuberculosis

dc.contributor.authorJha, Swati
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Nazir Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorClark, David
dc.contributor.authorLewis, James J.
dc.contributor.authorOmar, Shaheed Vally
dc.contributor.authorDreyer, Andries
dc.contributor.authorChihota, Violet
dc.contributor.authorChurchyard, Gavin
dc.contributor.authorDowdy, David W.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-21T07:02:34Z
dc.date.available2016-07-21T07:02:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-20
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Automated digital microscopy has the potential to improve the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), particularly in settings where molecular testing is too expensive to perform routinely. The cost-effectiveness of TB diagnostic algorithms using automated digital microscopy remains uncertain. METHODS Using data from a demonstration study of an automated digital microscopy system (TBDx, Applied Visual Systems, Inc.), we performed an economic evaluation of TB diagnosis in South Africa from the health system perspective. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per new TB diagnosis made. We considered costs and effectiveness of different algorithms for automated digital microscopy, including as a stand-alone test and with confirmation of positive results with Xpert MTB/RIF (‘Xpert’, Cepheid, Inc.). Results were compared against both manual microscopy and universal Xpert testing. RESULTS In settings willing to pay $2000 per incremental TB diagnosis, universal Xpert was the preferred strategy. However, where resources were not sufficient to support universal Xpert, and a testing volume of at least 30 specimens per day could be ensured, automated digital microscopy with Xpert confirmation of low-positive results could facilitate the diagnosis of 79–84% of all Xpert-positive TB cases, at 50–60% of the total cost. The cost-effectiveness of this strategy was $1280 per incremental TB diagnosis (95% uncertainty range, UR: $340-$3440) in the base case, but improved under conditions likely reflective of many settings in sub-Saharan Africa: $677 per diagnosis (95% UR: $450-$935) when sensitivity of manual smear microscopy was lowered to 0.5, and $956 per diagnosis (95% UR: $40-$2910) when the prevalence of multidrug-resistant TB was lowered to 1%. CONCLUSIONS Although universal Xpert testing is the preferred algorithm for TB diagnosis when resources are sufficient, automated digital microscopy can identify the majority of cases and halve the cost of diagnosis and treatment when resources are more scarce and multidrug-resistant TB is not common.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMedical Microbiologyen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2016en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipFunded in part by the B. Frank and Kathleen Polk Assistant Professorship in Epidemiology (to DWD). Applied Visual Systems, Inc. support for open-access publication fees.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.plosone.orgen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationJha S, Ismail N, Clark D, Lewis JJ, Omar S, Dreyer A, et al. (2016) Cost-Effectiveness of Automated Digital Microscopy for Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0157554. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157554.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0157554
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/56007
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_ZA
dc.rights© 2016 Jha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_ZA
dc.subjectMolecular testingen_ZA
dc.subjectTB diagnosisen_ZA
dc.subjectXpert testingen_ZA
dc.subjectTuberculosis (TB)en_ZA
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of automated digital microscopy for diagnosis of active tuberculosisen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jha_CostEffective_2016.pdf
Size:
376.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: