Comparative metabolism as a key driver of wildlife species sensitivity to human and veterinary pharmaceuticals

dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Thomas H.
dc.contributor.authorMadden, Judith C.
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Vinny
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Colin H.
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-27T08:19:36Z
dc.date.available2015-07-27T08:19:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-10
dc.description.abstractHuman and veterinary drug development addresses absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination and toxicology (ADMET) of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) in the target species. Metabolism is an important factor in controlling circulating plasma and target tissue API concentrations and in generating metabolites which are more easily eliminated in bile, faeces and urine. The essential purpose of xenobiotic metabolism is to convert lipid-soluble, non-polar and non-excretable chemicals into water soluble, polar molecules that are readily excreted. Xenobiotic metabolism is classified into Phase I enzymatic reactions (which add or expose reactive functional groups on xenobiotic molecules), Phase II reactions (resulting in xenobiotic conju-gation with large water-soluble, polar molecules) and Phase III cellular efflux transport processes. The human–fish plasma model provides a useful approach to understanding the pharmacokinetics of APIs (e.g. diclofenac, ibu-profen and propranolol) in freshwater fish, where gill and liver metabolism of APIs have been shown to be of importance. By contrast, wildlife species with low metabolic competency may exhibit zero-order metabolic (pharmacoki-netic) profiles and thus high API toxicity, as in the case of diclofenac and the dramatic decline of vulture populations across the Indian subcontinent. A similar threat looms for African Cape Griffon vultures exposed to ketoprofen and meloxicam, recent studies indicating toxicity relates to zero-order metabolism (suggesting P450 Phase I enzyme system or Phase II glucuronida-tion deficiencies). While all aspects of ADMET are important in toxicity evaluations, these observations demonstrate the importance of methods for predicting API comparative metabolism as a central part of environmental risk assessment.en_ZA
dc.description.embargo2015-10-31en_ZA
dc.description.librarianhb2015en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.orgen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationHutchinson, TH, Madden, JC, Naidoo, V & Walker, CH 2014, 'Comparative metabolism as a key driver of wildlife species sensitivity to human and veterinary pharmaceuticals', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 369, art. #20130583, pp. 1-9.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0080-4622 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2054-0280 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1098/rstb.2013.0583
dc.identifier.otherA-1508-2008
dc.identifier.other8621439700
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/49157
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherRoyal Societyen_ZA
dc.rights© The Royal Society 2014en_ZA
dc.subjectMedicinesen_ZA
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_ZA
dc.subjectExposureen_ZA
dc.subjectBirdsen_ZA
dc.subjectFishen_ZA
dc.subjectInvertebratesen_ZA
dc.titleComparative metabolism as a key driver of wildlife species sensitivity to human and veterinary pharmaceuticalsen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hutchinson_Comparative_2014.pdf
Size:
444.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: