Cohort and tag-site specific tag-loss rates in mark-recapture studies : a southern elephant seal cautionary case

dc.contributor.authorOosthuizen, Wessel Christiaan
dc.contributor.authorDe Bruyn, P.J. Nico
dc.contributor.authorBester, Marthan Nieuwoudt
dc.contributor.authorGirondot, Marc
dc.contributor.emailwcoosthuizen@up.ac.zaen
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-23T08:51:15Z
dc.date.available2011-02-23T08:51:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.description.abstractMarker-loss is a common feature of mark–recapture studies and important as it may bias parameter estimation. A slight alteration in tag-site of double tagged southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina), marked at Marion Island from 1983 to 2005 in an ongoing mark–recapture program, had important consequences for tagloss. We calculated age-specific tag-retention rates and cumulative tag-retention probabilities using a maximum likelihood model selection approach in the software application TAG LOSS 3.2.0. Under the tag-loss independence assumption, double tag-loss of inner interdigital webbing tags (IIT; 17 cohorts) remained below 1% in the first 5 yr and increased monotonically as seals aged, with higher tag-loss in males. Lifetime cumulative IIT tag-loss was 11.9% for females and 18.4% for males, and equivalent for all cohorts. Changing the tag-site to the outer interdigital webbing (OIT; 6 cohorts) resulted in increased and cohort-dependent tag-loss, although the variation (mean ± 95% CI) in cumulative tag-loss probabilities never exceeded 5.3% between cohorts at similar age. Although different studies may homogenize techniques, we advocate the importance of data set-specific assessment of tag-loss rates to ensure greatest confidence in population parameters obtained from mark–recapture experiments. Permanent marking should be implemented where feasible.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Department of Science and Technology, through the National Research Foundation (NRF), provided financial support. WCO received financial support from a NRF Grantholder-linked bursary within the project “Conservation of Seabirds, Shorebirds and Seals” led by L. Underhill of the Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Townen
dc.identifier.citationOosthuizen, WC, De Bruyn, PJN, Bester, MN & Girandot, N 2010, 'Cohort and tag-site-specific tag-loss rates in mark–recapture studies : a southern elephant seal cautionary case', Marine Mammal Science, vol. 26, no.2, pp. 225-236. [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118534279/home]en
dc.identifier.issn0824-0469
dc.identifier.other10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00328.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/15930
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWiley -Blackwellen
dc.rights© 2009 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy. The definite version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com.en
dc.subjectMirounga leoninaen
dc.subjectMark–resighten
dc.subjectCohort heterogeneityen
dc.subjectDouble taggingen
dc.subjectMarker-lossen
dc.subjectMarion Islanden
dc.subjectPhocidsen
dc.subjectTag sheddingen
dc.subjectTag placementen
dc.subject.lcshSouthern elephant seal -- Markingen
dc.subject.lcshAnimal markingen
dc.titleCohort and tag-site specific tag-loss rates in mark-recapture studies : a southern elephant seal cautionary caseen
dc.typePostprint Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Oosthuizen_Cohort(2010).pdf
Size:
407.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: