Cohort and tag-site specific tag-loss rates in mark-recapture studies : a southern elephant seal cautionary case
dc.contributor.author | Oosthuizen, Wessel Christiaan | |
dc.contributor.author | De Bruyn, P.J. Nico | |
dc.contributor.author | Bester, Marthan Nieuwoudt | |
dc.contributor.author | Girondot, Marc | |
dc.contributor.email | wcoosthuizen@up.ac.za | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-23T08:51:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-02-23T08:51:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Marker-loss is a common feature of mark–recapture studies and important as it may bias parameter estimation. A slight alteration in tag-site of double tagged southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina), marked at Marion Island from 1983 to 2005 in an ongoing mark–recapture program, had important consequences for tagloss. We calculated age-specific tag-retention rates and cumulative tag-retention probabilities using a maximum likelihood model selection approach in the software application TAG LOSS 3.2.0. Under the tag-loss independence assumption, double tag-loss of inner interdigital webbing tags (IIT; 17 cohorts) remained below 1% in the first 5 yr and increased monotonically as seals aged, with higher tag-loss in males. Lifetime cumulative IIT tag-loss was 11.9% for females and 18.4% for males, and equivalent for all cohorts. Changing the tag-site to the outer interdigital webbing (OIT; 6 cohorts) resulted in increased and cohort-dependent tag-loss, although the variation (mean ± 95% CI) in cumulative tag-loss probabilities never exceeded 5.3% between cohorts at similar age. Although different studies may homogenize techniques, we advocate the importance of data set-specific assessment of tag-loss rates to ensure greatest confidence in population parameters obtained from mark–recapture experiments. Permanent marking should be implemented where feasible. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Department of Science and Technology, through the National Research Foundation (NRF), provided financial support. WCO received financial support from a NRF Grantholder-linked bursary within the project “Conservation of Seabirds, Shorebirds and Seals” led by L. Underhill of the Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Oosthuizen, WC, De Bruyn, PJN, Bester, MN & Girandot, N 2010, 'Cohort and tag-site-specific tag-loss rates in mark–recapture studies : a southern elephant seal cautionary case', Marine Mammal Science, vol. 26, no.2, pp. 225-236. [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118534279/home] | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0824-0469 | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00328.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15930 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wiley -Blackwell | en |
dc.rights | © 2009 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy. The definite version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com. | en |
dc.subject | Mirounga leonina | en |
dc.subject | Mark–resight | en |
dc.subject | Cohort heterogeneity | en |
dc.subject | Double tagging | en |
dc.subject | Marker-loss | en |
dc.subject | Marion Island | en |
dc.subject | Phocids | en |
dc.subject | Tag shedding | en |
dc.subject | Tag placement | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Southern elephant seal -- Marking | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Animal marking | en |
dc.title | Cohort and tag-site specific tag-loss rates in mark-recapture studies : a southern elephant seal cautionary case | en |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en |