First report of the concentrations and implications of DDT residues in chicken eggs from a malaria-controlled area

dc.contributor.authorBouwman, Hindrik
dc.contributor.authorBornman, Maria S. (Riana)
dc.contributor.authorVan Dyk, Cobus
dc.contributor.authorBarnhoorn, Irene E.J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-19T06:17:28Z
dc.date.available2015-08-19T06:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2015-10
dc.description.abstractIn malaria-endemic areas, where DDT is still used for vector control by indoor residual spraying (IRS), the concentrations of DDT in human blood and breast milk are high, and there are indications of human health impacts. To identify the possible avenues of exposure reduction, we created the concept of a Total Homestead Environment Approach (THEA). THEA characterizes the interactions between DDT, humans, and the biota within and around homesteads. One dietary route of human exposure and uptake of DDT, namely, chicken egg consumption, has to our knowledge never been studied. The RDDT in eggs from a DDT-sprayed village ranged between 5200 and 48,000 ng/g wm (wet mass), with a median of 11,000 ng/g wm. On a lipid mass-basis (lm), the mean RDDT for eggs from the sprayed village was 100,000 ng/g lm. The maximum egg concentration observed was three orders of magnitude higher than the median. The acceptable daily intake (ADI) was not exceeded based on the consumption of three eggs per week for a 60 kg person. This equates to an intake of 0.089 g DDT per person per year. Chicken egg consumption is therefore a possible target for exposure reduction, probably best achieved by reducing the DDT concentrations in soils.en_ZA
dc.description.embargo2016-10-31en_ZA
dc.description.librarianhb2015en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africaen_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphereen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBouwman, H, Bornman, MS, Van Dyk, C & Barnhoorn, EJ 2015, 'First report of the concentrations and implications of DDT residues in chicken eggs from a malaria-controlled area', Chemosphere, vol.137, pp.174-177.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.097
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/49378
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Chemosphere. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Chemosphere, vol.137, pp.174-17, 2015. doi : 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.097.en_ZA
dc.subjectFree-rangeen_ZA
dc.subjectAcceptable daily intake (ADI)en_ZA
dc.subjectIndoor residual spraying (IRS)en_ZA
dc.subjectTotal homestead environment approach (THEA)en_ZA
dc.subjectMaximum residue level (MRL)en_ZA
dc.titleFirst report of the concentrations and implications of DDT residues in chicken eggs from a malaria-controlled areaen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bouwman_First_2015.pdf
Size:
365.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: