A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa

dc.contributor.authorClements, Hayley S.
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Reinette
dc.contributor.authorDe Vos, Alta
dc.contributor.authorDo Linh San, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorHempson, Gareth P.
dc.contributor.authorLinden, Birthe
dc.contributor.authorMaritz, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorMonadjem, Ara
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Chevonne
dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Frances
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorChild, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorDi Minin, Enrico
dc.contributor.authorEsler, Karen J.
dc.contributor.authorHamann, Maike
dc.contributor.authorLoft, Ty
dc.contributor.authorReyers, Belinda
dc.contributor.authorSelomane, Odirilwe
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Geethen
dc.contributor.authorSkowno, Andrew L.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-06T10:47:22Z
dc.date.available2026-03-06T10:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY : The expert-elicited bii4africa dataset used in this study is available on Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6710463.v1). Input data on species range maps and threat categories are available through the IUCN Red List (https://www.iucnredlist.org/) and Birdlife International (http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis). Input data on ecoregions are available through Ecoregions2017 Resolve (https://ecoregions.appspot.com/). Input data on plant forms in the RAINBIO65 dataset are available on GitHub (https://gdauby.github.io/rainbio/). Previous BII assessments to which we compared our assessment are available from the Natural History Museum for ref. 13 (https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/global-map-of-the-biodiversity-intactness-index-from-newbold-et-al-2016-science), and from Oonsie Biggs for the Scholes and Biggs4 map. The land-use and BII maps generated during this study are available on Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29773169.v1), and can be visualized and downloaded on a Google Earth Engine App (https://geethensingh.users.earthengine.app/view/bii). Source data are provided with this paper. CODE AVAILABILITY : The land-use mapping code is available on GitHub and Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17597480), and the R scripts and data for mapping the BII and for producing plots (Fig. 3b,c and Extended Data Figs. 2, 4 and 6e) are available on Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29773169.v1).
dc.description.abstractMaintaining biodiversity is central to the sustainable development agenda. However, a lack of context-specific biodiversity information at policy-relevant scales has posed major limitations to decision-makers. To address this challenge, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the biodiversity intactness of sub-Saharan Africa using place-based knowledge of 200 African biodiversity experts. We estimate that the region has on average lost 24% of its pre-colonial and pre-industrial faunal and floral population abundances, ranging from losses of <20% for disturbance-adapted herbaceous plants to 80% for some large mammals. Rwanda and Nigeria are the least intact (<55%), whereas Namibia and Botswana are the most intact (>85%). Notably, most remaining organisms occur in unprotected, relatively untransformed rangelands and natural forests. Losses in biodiversity intactness in the worst-affected biomes are driven by land transformation into cropland in grasslands and fynbos (Mediterranean-type ecosystems), by non-agricultural degradation in forests and by a combination of the two drivers in savannas. This assessment provides decision-makers with multifaceted, contextually appropriate and policy-relevant information on the state of biodiversity in an understudied region of the world. Our approach could be used in other regions, including better-studied localities, to integrate contextual, place-based knowledge into multiscale assessments of biodiversity status and impacts.
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Institute
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomology
dc.description.departmentAgricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development
dc.description.departmentFuture Africa
dc.description.librarianhj2026
dc.description.sdgSDG-15: Life on land
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is part of the bii4africa project (https://bii4africa.org/), which was funded by a Jennifer Ward Oppenheimer research grant; support from the South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI); funded by the European Union.
dc.description.urihttps://www.nature.com/
dc.identifier.citationClements, H.S., Biggs, R., De Vos, A. et al. A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 649, 113–121 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09781-7.
dc.identifier.issn0028-0836 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1476-4687 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1038/s41586-025-09781-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/108812
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2026. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.subjectBiodiversity
dc.subjectConservation biology
dc.subjectDeveloping world
dc.subjectEcosystem ecology
dc.titleA place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Clements_PlaceBased_2026.pdf
Size:
28.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: