A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research

dc.contributor.authorCaravaggi, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Peter B.
dc.contributor.authorBurton, A. Cole
dc.contributor.authorFinlay, Caroline M.V.
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Matt W.
dc.contributor.authorRowcliffe, Marcus J.
dc.contributor.authorWood, Mike D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-25T06:28:04Z
dc.date.available2017-10-25T06:28:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAn understanding of animal behaviour is important if conservation initiatives are to be effective. However, quantifying the behaviour of wild animals presents significant challenges. Remote-sensing camera traps are becoming increasingly popular survey instruments that have been used to non-invasively study a variety of animal behaviours, yielding key insights into behavioural repertoires. They are well suited to ethological studies and provide considerable opportunities for generating conservation-relevant behavioural data if novel and robust methodological and analytical solutions can be developed. This paper reviews the current state of camera-trap-based ethological studies, describes new and emerging directions in camera-based conservation behaviour, and highlights a number of limitations and considerations of particular relevance for camerabased studies. Three promising areas of study are discussed: (1) documenting anthropogenic impacts on behaviour; (2) incorporating behavioural responses into management planning and (3) using behavioural indicators such as giving up densities and daily activity patterns. We emphasize the importance of reporting methodological details, utilizing emerging camera trap metadata standards and central data repositories for facilitating reproducibility, comparison and synthesis across studies. Behavioural studies using camera traps are in their infancy; the full potential of the technology is as yet unrealized. Researchers are encouraged to embrace conservation-driven hypotheses in order to meet future challenges and improve the efficacy of conservation and management processes.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentCentre for Wildlife Managementen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2017en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe contribution of M.D. Wood was supported by the TREE project (www.ceh.ac. uk/TREE) funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Environment Agency and Radioactive Waste Management Limited. The contributions of C.M.V. Finlay were supported by the Red Squirrels United project (http://www.redsquirrelsunited.org.uk/) funded by EU Life and Heritage Lottery Fund.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2056-3485en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationCaravaggi, A., Banks, P.B., Burton, A.C., Finlay, C.M.V., Haswell, P.M., Hayward, M.W., Rowcliffe, M.J. & Wood, M.D. 2017, 'A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research', Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 109-122.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2056-3485 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1002/rse2.48
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/62921
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_ZA
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.en_ZA
dc.subjectAnthropogenic impactsen_ZA
dc.subjectBehavioural indicatorsen_ZA
dc.subjectEthologyen_ZA
dc.subjectManagementen_ZA
dc.subjectMonitoringen_ZA
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_ZA
dc.titleA review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour researchen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Caravaggi_Review_2017.pdf
Size:
1.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: