Vonnisbespreking : Is die Moslemhuwelik nou ’n erkende huwelik? Faro v Bingham NO[2013] ZAWCHC 159 (25 Oktober 2013)

dc.contributor.authorSchoeman-Malan, Linda
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-14T06:25:44Z
dc.date.available2015-09-14T06:25:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.description.abstractMuslim marriages are not recognised in South African civil law, as they are potentially polygamous. In the recent Western Cape High Court decision of Faro v Bingham the position of Muslim spouses in Islamic marriages and the consequences thereof again came to the fore. The non-recognition of Muslim marriages has resulted in hardships for Muslim spouses in areas of marriage, devolvement of marriage by divorce or death, maintenance rights and inheritance law. In comparing the South African law with Muslim personal law there are found to be fundamental differences between the two systems with regard to the rights granted to civil law spouses in marriage and divorce. Muslim spouses are often the innocent victims of the social and psychological effects of polygamy. While a secular court grants a civil divorce the Islamic law of divorce is practically administered by Islamic organisations such as the Muslim Judicial Council. The draft Muslim Marriages Bill (2010) was published for commentary in January 2011. The Bill constitutes an attempt to reconcile the classical Islamic law with the constitutional values. Since its publication nothing has been done to speed up the process, due to constitutional and religious turmoil between women's rights activists and traditionalists. While it is uncertain if, and when, the bill will be accepted, the judiciary (secular courts) has increasingly recognised some of the legal consequences of Muslim marriages on a case-by-case basis. However, the Muslim marriage has not been formally accepted by the courts as a valid union in terms of the Marriage Act 25 of 1961. In the Faro case an action was brought against the executrix of the deceased's estate by the surviving spouse to enable her to inherit intestate from the deceased and to claim maintenance from the deceased's estate. The pertinent question was whether she was still married to the deceased or if he had divorced her through presenting the talaq. The court was asked, inter alia, to regard marriages solemnised according to tenets of Islamic law to be valid marriages in terms of the Marriages Act. The position and role of the Muslim Judicial Council and the Master were questioned when dealing with factual disputes. The court granted her relief on her status as a widow, but postponed certain prayers giving the legislator another opportunity to promulgate legislation regarding Muslim marriages. The court set a deadline to the legislator to urgently report back on the enactment of the draft Muslim Marriages Bill.en_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2015en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/litnet?en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.litnet.co.za/Category/akademies/litnet-akademiesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationSchoeman-Malan, L 2015, 'Vonnisbespreking : Is die Moslemhuwelik nou ’n erkende huwelik? Faro v Bingham NO[2013] ZAWCHC 159 (25 Oktober 2013)', LitNet Akademies, vol, 12, no. 1, pp. 267-290.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1995-5928
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/49808
dc.language.isoAfrikaansen_ZA
dc.publisherLitneten_ZA
dc.rightsLitNeten_ZA
dc.subjectConstitutionalityen_ZA
dc.subjectCivil marriageen_ZA
dc.subjectDivorceen_ZA
dc.subjectExecutoren_ZA
dc.subjectInheritanceen_ZA
dc.subjectMarriage officeren_ZA
dc.subjectMaintenanceen_ZA
dc.subjectMasteren_ZA
dc.subjectMuslim marriageen_ZA
dc.subjectBurgerlike huweliken_ZA
dc.subjectGrondwetlikheiden_ZA
dc.subjectEgskeidingen_ZA
dc.subjectEksekuteuren_ZA
dc.subjectErfregen_ZA
dc.subjectHuweliksbevestigeren_ZA
dc.subjectOnderhouden_ZA
dc.subjectMeesteren_ZA
dc.subjectMoslemhuweliken_ZA
dc.titleVonnisbespreking : Is die Moslemhuwelik nou ’n erkende huwelik? Faro v Bingham NO[2013] ZAWCHC 159 (25 Oktober 2013)en_ZA
dc.title.alternativeIs the Muslim marriage now a recognised marriage?en_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SchoemanMalan_Vonnisbespreking_2015.pdf
Size:
146.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: