Scale‑dependent bi‑trophic interactions in a semi‑arid savanna : how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plants

dc.contributor.authorVan der Waal, Cornelis
dc.contributor.authorDe Kroon, Hans
dc.contributor.authorVan Langevelde, Frank
dc.contributor.authorDe Boer, Willem
dc.contributor.authorHeitkönig, Ignas M. A.
dc.contributor.authorSlotow, Rob
dc.contributor.authorPretorius, Yolanda
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-06T08:57:47Z
dc.date.available2016-06-06T08:57:47Z
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.description.abstractThe scale of resource heterogeneity may influence how resources are locally partitioned between co-existing large and small organisms such as trees and grasses in savannas. Scale-related plant responses may, in turn, influence herbivore use of the vegetation. To examine these scale-dependent bi-trophic interactions, we varied fertilizer [(nitrogen (N)/phosphorus (P)/potassium (K)] applications to patches to create different scales of nutrient patchiness (patch size 2 × 2 m, 10 × 10 m, or wholeplot 50 × 50 m) in a large field experiment in intact African savanna. Within-patch fertilizer concentration and the total fertilizer load per plot were independently varied. We found that fertilization increased the leaf N and P concentrations of trees and grasses, resulting in elevated utilization by browsers and grazers. Herbivory off-take was particularly considerable at higher nutrient concentrations. Scale-dependent effects were weak. The net effect of fertilization and herbivory was that plants in fertilized areas tended to grow less and develop smaller rather than larger standing biomass compared to plants growing in areas that remained unfertilized. When all of these effects were considered together at the community (plot) level, herbivory completely eliminated the positive effects of fertilization on the plant community. While this was true for all scales of fertilization, grasses tended to profit more from coarsegrained fertilization and trees from fine-grained fertilization. We conclude that in herbivore-dominated communities, such as the African savanna, nutrient patchiness results in the herbivore community profiting rather more than the plant community, irrespective of the scale of patchiness. At the community level, the allometric scaling theory’s prediction of plant—and probably also animal—production does not hold or may even be reversed as a result of complex bitrophic interactions.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentCentre for Wildlife Managementen_ZA
dc.description.librarianhb2016en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipNWO–Wotro (Grant no. W01.65.216).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://link.springer.com/journal/442en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDe Waal, C, De Kroon, H, Van Langeveld, F, De Boer, WF, Heitkönig, IMA, Slotow, R, Pretorius, Y & Prins, HHT 2016, 'Scale‑dependent bi‑trophic interactions in a semi‑arid savanna : how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plants', Oecologia, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 1173-1185.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0029-8549 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00442-016-3627-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/52880
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSpringeren_ZA
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_ZA
dc.subjectTree–grassen_ZA
dc.subjectNutrientsen_ZA
dc.subjectTrophic cascadeen_ZA
dc.subjectGrazingen_ZA
dc.subjectAllometric scaling theoryen_ZA
dc.titleScale‑dependent bi‑trophic interactions in a semi‑arid savanna : how herbivores eliminate benefits of nutrient patchiness to plantsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VanDerWaal_Scale_2016.pdf
Size:
612.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: