What’s the safest way home? Mapping safe transport routes in South Africa with (and without) crime data

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Theron, Kayla
Breetzke, Gregory Dennis

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

Safety is arguably the single biggest daily concern for commuters. Popular navigation software systems such as Google Maps, TomTom and Waze do not however currently give the same weight of consideration to crime risk when directing road users to the safest and shortest routes as they do existing traffic knowledge. In this study we propose three simple methods to delineate the safest and shortest route between any two locations in South Africa considering crime risk. The first method uses historical crime data to delineate the safest and shortest route; the second method, uses only the location of so-called ‘risky facilities’ to determine the safest and shortest route; while the third method uses a combination of both historical crime data and facility data to delineate the optimal route. We contrast the resultant routes delineating by these three methods and speculate on the policy implications of integrating this knowledge into future navigation software systems.

Description

DATA AVAILABILITY : The data for this study is a combination of open datasets and data compiled by the South African Police Services (SAPS). Due to the sensitive nature of some of the datasets, they are not publicly accessible. However, the data can be made available by the authors upon reasonable request and subject to the approval of the SAPS.

Keywords

Crime analysis, Street segment, Network, Routing, South Africa (SA), SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG-11:Sustainable cities and communities

Citation

Theron, K. & Breetzke, G. 2024, 'What’s the safest way home? Mapping safe transport routes in South Africa with (and without) crime data', Journal of Transportation Security, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1-15. https://DOI.org/10.1007/s12198-024-00278-4.