Friends or foes? Polyploidy and competition in a grassland geophyte

dc.contributor.authorDe Sousa, Damian Vaz
dc.contributor.authorGreve, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Nicolette Jane
dc.contributor.authorOberlander, Kenneth Carl
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-17T11:32:45Z
dc.date.available2026-03-17T11:32:45Z
dc.date.issued2026-02
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Data are available from Figshare: https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.29164067 (Vaz de Sousa et al. 2025).
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have suggested polyploids may possess a competitive advantage over diploids, due to their larger size, increased vigour or ability to better respond to abiotic stress. However, few studies have tested the effect of polyploidy on competitive ability directly, and only relatively recently has this oversight begun to be addressed. Here we assessed potential differences in competitive ability between diploids and tetraploids of a widespread African grassland geophyte, Oxalis obliquifolia. Diploid and tetraploid plants were grown in identical environmental conditions under four different competition scenarios. As a control, diploids and tetraploids were grown under solitary conditions. For intra-cytotype competition, pairs of diploids and tetraploids were planted together. Inter-cytotype competition involved planting individual diploids and tetraploids with one another, and for interspecies competition individual diploids and tetraploids were planted with Themeda triandra seedlings. Thirty-seven morphological, physiological and phenological traits were recorded and assessed for associations between cytotype and competition treatment using ordinations and GLMs. Ordination showed diploids and tetraploids as distinct clusters, with very little separation based on competition treatment. Univariate analyses showed tetraploids have larger but fewer organ structures than diploids, suggesting a tradeoff between these traits. Tetraploids also produce larger seeds. Diploids showed reduced numbers of leaves and were more negatively impacted by interspecies competition than tetraploids, suggesting tetraploids may potentially be the better interspecies competitor. Tetraploids also extended their flowering season in response to inter-cytotype and interspecies competition. Cytotypes respond differently under different competition treatments, and tetraploids may have a competitive advantage over diploids. However, this potential competitive asymmetry does not explain observed cytotype sympatry. Tetraploids also appear to differentiate between intra-cytotype competition, and competition with diploids and other species. The potential for abiotic factors to impact these competition dynamics remains unexplored.
dc.description.departmentPlant Production and Soil Science
dc.description.librarianhj2026
dc.description.sdgSDG-15: Life on land
dc.description.urihttps://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/16000706
dc.identifier.citationDe Sousa, D.V., Greve, M., Taylor, N.J. & Oberlander, K.C. 2026, 'Friends or foes? Polyploidy and competition in a grassland geophyte', Oikos, vol. 2026, no. 2, art. e11724, doi : 10.1002/oik.11724.
dc.identifier.issn0030-1299 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1600-0706 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1002/oik.11724
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/109038
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Oikos published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectGeophyte
dc.subjectPolyploidy
dc.subjectSympatry
dc.titleFriends or foes? Polyploidy and competition in a grassland geophyte
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DeSousa_Friends_2025.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DeSousa_FriendsSuppl_2025.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: