Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options
dc.contributor.author | Pioro, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zirn, U. | |
dc.contributor.author | Duffey, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Naidin, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mokry, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gospodinov, Ye. | |
dc.contributor.author | Baig, F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-10T06:33:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-10T06:33:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.description.abstract | Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, South Africa, 30 June - 2 July, 2008. | en_ZA |
dc.description.abstract | Currently there are a number of Generation IV SuperCritical Water-cooled nuclear Reactor (SCWR) concepts under development worldwide. The main objectives for developing and utilizing SCWRs are: 1) Increase gross thermal efficiency of current Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) from 33 – 35% to approximately 45 – 50%, and 2) Decrease the capital and operational costs and, in doing so, decrease electrical-energy costs (~$1000 US/kW or even less). SCW NPPs will have much higher operating parameters compared to current NPPs (i.e., pressures of about 25 MPa and outlet temperatures up to 625°C). Additionally, SCWRs will have a simplified flow circuit in which steam generators, steam dryers, steam separators, etc. will be eliminated. Furthermore, SCWRs operating at higher temperatures can facilitate an economical co-generation of hydrogen through thermo-chemical cycles (particularly, the copper-chlorine cycle) or direct high-temperature electrolysis. To decrease significantly the development costs of a SCW NPP, to increase its reliability, and to achieve similar high thermal efficiencies as the advanced fossil steam cycles it should be determined whether SCW NPPs can be designed with a steam-cycle arrangement that closely matches that of mature SuperCritical (SC) fossil power plants (including their SC turbine technology). The state-of-the-art SC steam cycles in fossil power plants are designed with a single-steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating and reach thermal steamcycle efficiencies up to 54% (i.e., net plant efficiencies of up to 43% on a Higher Heating Value (HHV) Basis). Therefore, simplified no-reheat, single-reheat, and double-reheat cycles without heat regeneration and a singlereheat cycle with heat regeneration based on the expected steam parameters of future SCW NPPs were analyzed in terms of their thermal efficiencies. On this basis, several conceptual steam-cycle arrangements of pressure-tube SCWRs, their corresponding T–s diagrams and steam-cycle thermal efficiencies (based on constant isentropic turbine and polytropic pump efficiencies) are presented in this paper. | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | vk2014 | en_ZA |
dc.format.extent | 9 pages | en_ZA |
dc.format.medium | en_ZA | |
dc.identifier.citation | Poiro, I, Zirn, U, Duffey, R, Naidin, M, Mokry, S, Gospodinov, Ye & Baig, F 2008, Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options, Paper presented to the 6th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, South Africa, 30 June - 2 July 2008. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9781868546916 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/42900 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics | en_ZA |
dc.relation.ispartof | HEFAT 2008 | en_US |
dc.rights | University of Pretoria | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Supercritical water cooled nuclear reactors | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Thermodynamic cycles options | en_ZA |
dc.subject | SCWR | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Nuclear power plants | en_ZA |
dc.subject | NPP | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Single steam reheat and regenerative feedwater heating | en_ZA |
dc.title | Supercritical water-cooled nuclear reactors: thermodynamic-cycles options | en_ZA |
dc.type | Presentation | en_ZA |