Allopatric speciation in ticks : genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

dc.contributor.authorLabruna, Marcelo B.
dc.contributor.authorNaranjo, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorMangold, Atilio J.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorEstrada-Pena, Agustín
dc.contributor.authorGuglielmone, Alberto A.
dc.contributor.authorJongejan, Frans
dc.contributor.authorDe la Fuente, Jose
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-07T11:23:18Z
dc.date.available2009-12-07T11:23:18Z
dc.date.issued2009-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, economically impact cattle industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. The morphological and genetic differences among R. microplus strains have been documented in the literature, suggesting that biogeographical and ecological separation may have resulted in boophilid ticks from America/Africa and those from Australia being different species. To test the hypothesis of the presence of different boophilid species, herein we performed a series of experiments to characterize the reproductive performance of crosses between R. microplus from Australia, Africa and America and the genetic diversity of strains from Australia, Asia, Africa and America. RESULTS: The results showed that the crosses between Australian and Argentinean or Mozambican strains of boophilid ticks are infertile while crosses between Argentinean and Mozambican strains are fertile. These results showed that tick strains from Africa (Mozambique) and America (Argentina) are the same species, while ticks from Australia may actually represent a separate species. The genetic analysis of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA and microsatellite loci were not conclusive when taken separately, but provided evidence that Australian tick strains were genetically different from Asian, African and American strains. CONCLUSION: The results reported herein support the hypothesis that at least two different species share the name R. microplus. These species could be redefined as R. microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (for American and African strains) and probably the old R. australis Fuller, 1899 (for Australian strains), which needs to be redescribed. However, experiments with a larger number of tick strains from different geographic locations are needed to corroborate these results.en
dc.identifier.citationLabruna, MB, Naranjo, V, Mangold, AJ, Thompson, C, Estrada-Pena, A, Guglielmone, AA, Jongejan, F & De La Fuente, J 2009, 'Allopatric speciation in ticks : genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus', BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, no. 46. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcevolbiol/]en
dc.identifier.issn1471-2148
dc.identifier.other10.1186/1471-2148-9-46
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/12295
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.relation.requiresAdobe Acrobat Readeren
dc.rights© 2009 Labruna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.subjectAllopatric speciationen
dc.subjectReproductive divergenceen
dc.subjectGeographic strainsen
dc.subject.lcshTicksen
dc.subject.lcshRhipicephalusen
dc.titleAllopatric speciation in ticks : genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplusen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Labruna_Allopatric(2009).pdf
Size:
737.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: