Comparative evaluation of creep response of X20 and P91 steam piping networks in operation

dc.contributor.authorSalifu, Smith
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Dawood A.
dc.contributor.authorKok, Schalk
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-28T09:27:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-08
dc.description.abstractThe geometrical increase in the demand for electrical energy has posed serious pressure on the power generation components such as the steam pipes due to the consequential increase in the operating parameters such as temperature and pressure. This increment in operating parameters tends to limit the useful life of these pipes. Thus, high creep resistant materials such as X20 CrMoV12-1 and P91 (9Cr-1Mo) are used to manufacture steam pipes. In this paper, the creep behaviour of X20 CrMoV12-1 and P91 (9Cr-1Mo) steam piping network subjected to typical operating condition was determined via a finite element analysis code, Abaqus CAE/2017 alongside fe-safe/Turbolife software, and their results were compared. The maximum creep stress, strain rate, creep damage and worst creep life in both piping materials were developed on the intrados of the elbow, with P91 steam pipe having higher useful creep life. Furthermore, a good correlation was achieved between the result of the analytically calculated and numerically simulated creep rate at the straight section of the piping networks.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMechanical and Aeronautical Engineeringen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2021-07-24
dc.description.librarianhj2020en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipTshwane University of Technology, the University of Pretoria, South Africa and Eskom Power Plant Engineering Institute (Republic of South Africa).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://link.springer.com/journal/170en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationSalifu, S., Desai, D. & Kok, S. Comparative evaluation of creep response of X20 and P91 steam piping networks in operation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 109, 1987–1996 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05727-7.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0268-3768 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1433-3015 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00170-020-05727-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/77511
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSpringeren_ZA
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020. The original publication is available at : http://link.springer.comjournal/170.en_ZA
dc.subjectCreep rateen_ZA
dc.subjectCreep damageen_ZA
dc.subjectCreep lifeen_ZA
dc.subjectIntradosen_ZA
dc.subjectSubroutineen_ZA
dc.subjectPiping networken_ZA
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-04
dc.subject.otherSDG-04: Quality education
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-07
dc.subject.otherSDG-07: Affordable and clean energy
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-09
dc.subject.otherSDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-12
dc.subject.otherSDG-12: Responsible consumption and production
dc.titleComparative evaluation of creep response of X20 and P91 steam piping networks in operationen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Salifu_Comparative_2020.pdf
Size:
943.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: