Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa : a study protocol for a household randomized trial

dc.contributor.authorSangoro, Onyango P.
dc.contributor.authorFillinger, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorSaili, Kochelani
dc.contributor.authorNkya, Theresia Estomih
dc.contributor.authorMarubu, Rose
dc.contributor.authorMasaninga, Freddie
dc.contributor.authorTrigo, Sonia Casimiro
dc.contributor.authorTarumbwa, Casper
dc.contributor.authorHamainza, Busiku
dc.contributor.authorBaltazar, Candrinho
dc.contributor.authorMberikunashe, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorChisanga, Brian
dc.contributor.authorMenale, Kassie
dc.contributor.authorChanda, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorMutero, Clifford Maina
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T11:15:10Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T11:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-06
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : Concerted effort to control malaria has had a substantial impact on the transmission of the disease in the past two decades. In areas where reduced malaria transmission is being sustained through insecticide-based vector control interventions, primarily long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS), non-insecticidal complementary tools will likely be needed to push towards malaria elimination. Once interruption in local disease transmission is achieved, insecticide-based measures can be scaled down gradually and eventually phased out, saving on costs of sustaining control programs and mitigating any unintended negative health and environmental impacts posed by insecticides. These non-insecticidal methods could eventually replace insecticidal methods of vector control. House screening, a non-insecticidal method, has a long history in malaria control, but is still not widely adopted in subSaharan Africa. This study aims to add to the evidence base for this intervention in low transmission settings by assessing the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of house screening in areas where LLINs are conventionally used for malaria control. METHODS : A two-armed, household randomized clinical trial will be conducted in Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe to evaluate whether combined the use of house screens and LLINs affords better protection against clinical malaria in children between 6 months and 13 years compared to the sole use of LLINs. Eight hundred households will be enrolled in each study area, where 400 households will be randomly assigned the intervention, house screening, and LLINs while the control households will be provided with LLINs only. Clinical malaria incidence will be estimated by actively following up one child from each household for 6 months over the malaria transmission season. Crosssectional parasite prevalence will be estimated by testing all participating children for malaria parasites at the beginning and end of each transmission season using rapid diagnostic tests. CDC light traps and pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) will be used to sample adult mosquitoes and evaluate the impact of house screening on indoor mosquito density, species distribution, and sporozoite rates.en_US
dc.description.departmentSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH)en_US
dc.description.librariandm2022en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe multi-country trial is funded as part of the AFRO-II project by the Global Environment Facility (GEF Project ID 4668) through the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO-AFRO). Co-financing support is provided by the respective project countries for in-country activities and for technical support by icipe’s core funders including the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia; and the Government of the Republic of Kenya. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.trialsjournal.comen_US
dc.identifier.citationSangoro, O.P., Fillinger, U., Saili, K. et al. Evaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa: a study protocol for a household randomized trial. Trials 22, 883 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s13063-021-05768-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87215
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.subjectIntegrated vector managementen_US
dc.subjectHouse screeningen_US
dc.subjectMalaria eliminationen_US
dc.subjectResidual malaria transmissionen_US
dc.subjectLong-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs)en_US
dc.subjectIndoor residual spraying (IRS)en_US
dc.titleEvaluating the efficacy, impact, and feasibility of community-based house screening as a complementary malaria control intervention in southern Africa : a study protocol for a household randomized trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sangoro_Evaluating_2021.pdf
Size:
1.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sangoro_EvaluatingSupplementary_2021.pdf
Size:
474.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: