Characteristics and help-seeking behaviour of persons failing a national hearing screening test

Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Swanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.coadvisor De Sousa, Karina
dc.contributor.coadvisor Mahomed-Asmail, Faheema
dc.contributor.postgraduate Schönborn, Danielle
dc.date.accessioned 2024-08-07T09:22:26Z
dc.date.available 2024-08-07T09:22:26Z
dc.date.created 2020-05
dc.date.issued 2019-11
dc.description Dissertation (MA (Audiology))--University of Pretoria, 2019. en_US
dc.description.abstract A digits-in-noise test was launched as the smartphone hearing screening of South Africa (hearZA™) in 2016. This study investigated characteristics, help-seeking behaviour, and follow-up actions of individuals who failed the hearing screening, considering their stage of behavioural change. The study had two phases; phase one was a retrospective, cross-sectional intervention readiness (stage of change) analysis of 3092 listeners who failed the test. Phase two was a prospective survey of 59 participants to investigate follow-up actions after a failed test. In the retrospective study, the majority of listeners were in the precontemplation stage (75.5%), while the remaining were in contemplation (9.7%), preparation (8.2%), and action (6.6%) stages. Age and stage of change were significant predictors of the digits-in-noise speech recognition threshold (DIN SRT) (p < .05). SRTs deteriorated significantly (p < .05) with increasing age, and listeners in the precontemplation stage were significantly younger than in other stages (p < .05). In the prospective study, 1007 potential participants were contacted through electronic mail or short message services to complete the survey; however, only 59 did so. Of those, most (82.4%) did not think they have a hearing loss. Only, 13.6% followed up with an audiologist. Older individuals presented with poorer DIN SRTs and were in a more advanced stage of change. The majority that did not follow up after failing the screening test did not believe they had a hearing problem. A combination of factors, including poor DIN SRT, older age, and more advanced stage of change predisposed participants to follow up with audiological care. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MA (Audiology) en_US
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Humanities en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.other A2020 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/97486
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2021 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Digits-in-noise en_US
dc.subject Stage of change en_US
dc.subject Staging algorithm en_US
dc.subject Speech-to-noise ratio en_US
dc.subject Online hearing screening en_US
dc.subject Transtheoretical model en_US
dc.title Characteristics and help-seeking behaviour of persons failing a national hearing screening test en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record