A comprehensive review of water quality indices for lotic and lentic ecosystems

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mogane, Lazarus Katlego
dc.contributor.author Masebe, Tracy
dc.contributor.author Msagati, Titus A.M.
dc.contributor.author Ncube, Esper Jacobeth
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-27T05:44:02Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-27T05:44:02Z
dc.date.issued 2023-08
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY : The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. en_US
dc.description.abstract Freshwater resources play a pivotal role in sustaining life and meeting various domestic, agricultural, economic, and industrial demands. As such, there is a significant need to monitor the water quality of these resources. Water quality index (WQI) models have gradually gained popularity since their maiden introduction in the 1960s for evaluating and classifying the water quality of aquatic ecosystems. WQIs transform complex water quality data into a single dimensionless number to enable accessible communication of the water quality status of water resource ecosystems. To screen relevant articles, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was employed to include or exclude articles. A total of 17 peer-reviewed articles were used in the final paper synthesis. Among the reviewed WQIs, only the Canadian Council for Ministers of the Environment (CCME) index, Irish water quality index (IEWQI) and Hahn index were used to assess both lotic and lentic ecosystems. Furthermore, the CCME index is the only exception from rigidity because it does not specify parameters to select. Except for the West-Java WQI and the IEWQI, none of the reviewed WQI performed sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to improve the acceptability and reliability of the WQI. It has been proven that all stages of WQI development have a level of uncertainty which can be determined using statistical and machine learning tools. Extreme gradient boosting (XGB) has been reported as an effective machine learning tool to deal with uncertainties during parameter selection, the establishment of parameter weights, and determining accurate classification schemes. Considering the IEWQI model architecture and its effectiveness in coastal and transitional waters, this review recommends that future research in lotic or lentic ecosystems focus on addressing the underlying uncertainty issues associated with the WQI model in addition to the use of machine learning techniques to improve the predictive accuracy and robustness and increase the domain of application. en_US
dc.description.department School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) en_US
dc.description.librarian am2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-06:Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Open access funding provided by University of South Africa. en_US
dc.description.uri http://link.springer.com/journal/10661 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Mogane, L.K., Masebe, T., Msagati, T.A.M. 2023, 'A comprehensive review of water quality indices for lotic and lentic ecosystems', Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 195, no. 926, pp. 1-28. https://DOI.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11512-2. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0167-6369 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1573-2959 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s10661-023-11512-2
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96233
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. en_US
dc.subject Water quality index en_US
dc.subject Lotic en_US
dc.subject Lentic en_US
dc.subject Water quality parameters en_US
dc.subject Aquatic ecosystems en_US
dc.subject SDG-06: Clean water and sanitation en_US
dc.title A comprehensive review of water quality indices for lotic and lentic ecosystems en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record