Development of an improved kinetic model for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Mbatha, Siphesihle
Thomas, Sebastien
Parkhomenko, Ksenia
Roger, Anne-Cecile
Louis, Benoit
Cui, Xiaoti
Everson, Ray
Langmi, Henrietta Wakuna
Musyoka, Nicholas
Ren, Jianwei

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI

Abstract

The kinetics of methanol synthesis remains debatable for various reasons, such as the lack of scientifically conclusive agreement about reaction mechanisms. The focus of this paper is on the evaluation of the intrinsic kinetics of the methanol synthesis reaction based on CO2 hydrogenation and the associated reverse water–gas shift as overall reactions. The industrial methanol synthesis catalyst, Cu/ZnO/Al2O3/MgO, was used for performing the kinetic studies. An optimal kinetic model was assessed for its ability to predict the experimental data from differential to integral conditions, contrary to the typical fitting of only the integral conditions’ data (common practice, as reported in the literature). The catalyst testing and kinetic evaluations were performed at various temperatures (210–260 C) and pressures (40–77 bar), and for different stoichiometric numbers (0.9–1.9), H2/CO2 ratios (3.0–4.4) and carbon oxide ratios (0.9–1.0), in an isothermal fixed bed reactor, operated in a plug-flow mode. Experiments with CO in the feed were also generated and fitted. Different literature kinetic models with different assumptions on active sites, rate-determining steps, and hence, model formulations were fitted and compared. The original Seidel model appeared to fit the kinetic data very well, but it has twelve parameters. The modified model (MOD) we propose is derived from this Seidel model, but it has fewer (nine) parameters—it excludes CO hydrogenation, but it takes into consideration the morphological changes of active sites and CO adsorption. This MOD model, with three active sites, gave the best fit to all the data sets.

Description

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The data are available in the article.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL : TABLE S1: Graaf et al. original (Graaf et al., 1988) vs. Fitted; TABLE S2: Vanden Bussche and Froment original (van den Bussche & Froment, 1996) vs. fitted; TABLE S3: Slotboom et al. original 6 parameter model (Slotboom et al., 2020) vs. fitted; TABLE S4: Seidel et al. original (Seidel et al., 2018; Seidel et al., 2020) vs. fitted; TABLE S5: MOD parameters; TABLE S6. Plug flow calculation, this follows the criteria discussed in reference (Ertl et al., 1997; Delgado, 2006) [8,13,14,17,24,45,46].

Keywords

Methanol synthesis, CO2 hydrogenation, Langmuir–Hinshelwood/Hougen–Watson kinetics, Modified kinetic model, Power-to-methanol

Sustainable Development Goals

None

Citation

Mbatha, S.; Thomas, S.; Parkhomenko, K.; Roger, A.-C.; Louis, B.; Cui, X.; Everson, R.; Langmi, H.; Musyoka, N.; Ren, J. Development of an Improved Kinetic Model for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1349. https://DOI.org/10.3390/catal13101349.