Perceptions of hearing healthcare : a qualitative analysis of satisfied and dissatisfied online reviews

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Swanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.coadvisor Biagio de Jager, Leigh
dc.contributor.postgraduate van Bruggen, Sanchia
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-14T08:12:29Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-14T08:12:29Z
dc.date.created 2024-05
dc.date.issued 2023-08-31
dc.description Dissertation (MA (Audiology))--University of Pretoria, 2023. en_US
dc.description.abstract Online review platforms have become increasingly popular among healthcare consumers for providing feedback. The aim of this study was to comprehensively describe the hearing healthcare experience through the exploration of satisfied and dissatisfied consumer feedback as reported on Google reviews. This study employed a thematic analysis on open-text responses from Google regarding hearing healthcare clinics across 40 United States (U.S.) cities. Purposive sampling led to a sample that consisted of 500 5-star (satisfied) and 234 1-star (dissatisfied) reviews. Thematic analysis yielded nuanced dimensions of the hearing healthcare consumer experience, grouped into distinct domains, themes, and subthemes. Six common domains –overall experience, clinical outcomes, standard of care, facilities, audiologist, and administrative and support staff - were identified from the satisfied (5-star) and dissatisfied (1-star) consumer reviews. A seventh domain, ‘Inclusivity’, was identified amongst dissatisfied consumer reviews, describing interactions tainted by discrimination based on race, mode of communication, age, and insurance type. The overall experience domain revealed emotions, ranging from contentment and gratitude to dissatisfaction and waning loyalty. The findings highlighted the pivotal contribution of wellbeing, hearing- and product-related outcomes to the consumer experience, whilst consumers also shared expectations for punctuality, person-centred care, affordability of services, and efficient communication. Furthermore, facility quality, cleanliness and general atmosphere of institutions were identified as important ‘exterior’ factors. Professional competence displayed both by audiologists and support staff were prominent themes. Findings emphasize the critical dimensions of satisfied and dissatisfied hearing healthcare consumer experiences, identifying areas for service refinement, informing more person centric service-delivery in hearing healthcare. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MA (Audiology) en_US
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Humanities en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03: Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.25403/UPresearchdata.25158185 en_US
dc.identifier.other A2024 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/94594
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Hearing healthcare en_US
dc.subject Online reviews en_US
dc.subject Perceptions en_US
dc.subject Hearing healthcare consumers en_US
dc.subject Hearing healthcare reviews en_US
dc.subject SDG-03: Good health and well-being
dc.subject Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
dc.subject.other SDG-03: Good health and well-being
dc.subject.other Humanities theses SDG-03
dc.title Perceptions of hearing healthcare : a qualitative analysis of satisfied and dissatisfied online reviews en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record